From: Jochem Huhmann <joh@gmx.net>
To: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3n1osufqd.fsf@nova.revier.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38B3ABD6.71623993@cybercable.tm.fr>
* Eric Bischoff <ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr> wrote:
> My distribution will be used by Caldera OpenLinux and KDE project. I'm
> proposing to make it the standard docbook-tools as well, if you
> agree. Just let me know.
Could you be so kind and put the package up on ftp? Maybe also as tar.gz
for all of us without a RPM-based Linux (or Linux at all). You should
also contact the Debian Project which might also be interested in this
(you will probably at least get some help in packing this up as
Debian-Package, which would be nice to have for a "standard
docbook-tool"). Also SuSE might be interested, since they have such
scripts of their own.
I would also decide on a new name for the tools, all this db2something
is quite confusing. What about "doctool"?
Jochem
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-27 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <951281049.19725.ezmlm@sourceware.cygnus.com>
2000-12-27 6:36 ` was something else - now SGML and XML David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Horacio MG
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : " Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann [this message]
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` New list (was Re: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?) Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` was something else - now SGML and XML David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Mark Galassi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3n1osufqd.fsf@nova.revier.com \
--to=joh@gmx.net \
--cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).