From: Eric Bischoff <ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr>
To: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38B3ABD6.71623993@cybercable.tm.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000223085415.B611@ciberia.es>
Announcement :
I have been repackaging completly the DocBook tools and
rewritten all db* utilities.
What I have been seeking is :
- to have the db2* scripts change their status from "unmaintained"
to "maintained"
- to have better directory organization in /usr/lib/sgml
- to have things work better with alternate stylesheets
- to make as little assumptions as possible : no
"common" stylesheet for html and printout if not wished,
no need of merging the individual catalogs in a single CATALOG
if not wished, etc
- gnuish syntax
- compatibility (if no alternate stylesheets used) with
former docbook-tools
My distribution will be used by Caldera OpenLinux and KDE project. I'm
proposing to
make it the standard docbook-tools as well, if you agree. Just let me
know.
--
Eric Bischoff - Documentation and Localization
Caldera (Deutschland) GmbH - Linux for Business!
Tel: +49 9131 7192 300 - Fax: +49 9131 7192 399
http://www.caldera.de/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-27 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <951281049.19725.ezmlm@sourceware.cygnus.com>
2000-12-27 6:36 ` David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` was something else - now SGML and XML David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Mark Galassi
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27 6:36 ` was something else - now SGML and XML David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Horacio MG
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff [this message]
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : " Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` New list (was Re: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?) Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : " David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38B3ABD6.71623993@cybercable.tm.fr \
--to=ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr \
--cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).