public inbox for docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jochem Huhmann <joh@gmx.net>
To: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m31z63v7wo.fsf@nova.revier.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38B40C05.FD198BAE@cybercable.tm.fr>

* Eric Bischoff <ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr> wrote:
> Caldera is a RPM-based distribution, so my packaging will probably be
> only profitable for those with RPM-based distributions, like the current
> DocBook tools that only offer a mirror of the source packages for those
> without RPM. Furthermore, I have been told the Debian project already
> did a very clean packaging of its own (seeking a greater compatibility
> with them could also be a concern, BTW).

OK. What I meant is: There is some software like jade and the
stylesheets. There are a lot of wrappers around these - Marks tools, the
scripts from SuSE, the KDE-stuff and SGMLTools (for the most part a
wrapper written in python). The software should be packaged like any
other software, I don't see the point in putting it together with
scripts and such. This creates conflicts with other packages. Try to
install the SGMLTools (which come with the stylesheets and jade)
together with other packages, that also install the stylesheets. This is
a mess and every single Linux-Distribution comes up with it's own
mess. This is not part of a solution but a part of the problem.

> Currently, the docbook-stylesheets package from the docbook-tools
> includes three things :
> 1 - Norman Walsh's modular stylesheets
> 2 - the db2* and install-catalog scripts
> 3 - some "glue" files like "cygnus-common.dsl"
> 
> I think that (1) has to be packaged separately for modularity reasons, I
> suggest to rename (2) the "docbook-utils" (only a component of the
> docbook-tools), and to get rid of (3) because this kind of files imply a
> lot of assumptions on the way you are working.

There should be some "standard" for directory layout, location of the
catalog etc. Wrappers should build upon this common standard. So you
could use whichever you want.  

Actually I believe this is an issue for the LSB or FHS-Projects. Caldera
is also member of LSB and is responsible for the reference
implementation, or am I wrong? Maybe you should ask Ralf Flaxa
<rf@lst.de> who is assigned as technical lead for this task. Or ask on
one of the LSB-lists.


        Jochem

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!

  reply	other threads:[~2000-12-27  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <951281049.19725.ezmlm@sourceware.cygnus.com>
2000-12-27  6:36 ` was something else - now SGML and XML David Mason
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27  6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? David Mason
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36 ` David Mason
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27  6:36 ` Horacio MG
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Re : " Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36     ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27  6:36       ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36         ` Jochem Huhmann [this message]
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36             ` New list (was Re: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?) Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36               ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27  6:36               ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27  6:36               ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36     ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36       ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36 ` was something else - now SGML and XML David Mason
2000-12-27  6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? David Mason
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36     ` Mark Galassi
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Norman Walsh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m31z63v7wo.fsf@nova.revier.com \
    --to=joh@gmx.net \
    --cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).