From: Gregory Leblanc <GLeblanc@cu-portland.edu>
To: 'Jorge Godoy' <godoy@conectiva.com.br>,
Eric Bischoff <ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr>
Cc: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: RE: Evolution of the DocBook tools
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A5F46F4ED18FD211ABEE00105AC6CF077F7CD0@email.cu-portland.edu> (raw)
Please, mail the list when that list is online, I'm enjoying this
discussion.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jorge Godoy [ mailto:godoy@conectiva.com.br ]
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 4:45 AM
> To: Eric Bischoff
> Cc: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
> Subject: Re: Evolution of the DocBook tools
>
[snip]
> Which programs don't recognize the CATALOG keyword? Jade and OpenJade
> work with no problems. Programs that don't work aren't in accordance
> with the specifications. Should we support them or "brake" them and
> make the author improve their programs?
I'd break them, but I'm just a mean nasty guy...
> The problem with "iso-entities" is that some stylesheets refer to them
> on it's catalog. Making a patch in a packaged distribution (RPM, deb,
> etc.) is easy, but I don't know if it's good in a plain .tar.gz
> distribution (of course, a note saying that files were modified and
> the like would be enough).
When everything gets hashed out, just make a .tar.gz. I'm quite sure that
we can get a .spec file written for RPMs, either by myself or somebody who's
better at it. debs should be easy to make from there.
Greg
Sun Hardware Reference Maintainer
http://sun-ref.sunhelp.org/
next reply other threads:[~2000-12-27 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-27 6:36 Gregory Leblanc [this message]
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
[not found] <951281049.19725.ezmlm@sourceware.cygnus.com>
2000-12-27 6:36 ` db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Horacio MG
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : " Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-27 6:36 Peter Ring
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 Eric Bischoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A5F46F4ED18FD211ABEE00105AC6CF077F7CD0@email.cu-portland.edu \
--to=gleblanc@cu-portland.edu \
--cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
--cc=ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr \
--cc=godoy@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).