From: Christoph Muellner <cmuellner@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Jim Wilson <jimw@sifive.com>, Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>,
Christoph Muellner <cmuellner@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/10] RISC-V: Add s.ext-consuming INSNs for LR and SC [PR 100266]
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 21:36:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210505193651.2075405-9-cmuellner@gcc.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210505193651.2075405-1-cmuellner@gcc.gnu.org>
The current model of the LR and SC INSNs requires a sign-extension
to use the generated SImode value for conditional branches, which
only operate on XLEN registers.
However, the sign-extension is actually not required in both cases,
therefore this patch introduces additional INSNs that consume
the sign-extension.
Rationale:
The sign-extension of the loaded value of a LR.W is specified as
sign-extended. Therefore, a sign-extension is not required.
The sign-extension of the success value a SC.W is specified as
non-zero. As sign-extended non-zero value remains non-zero,
therefore the sign-extension is not required.
gcc/
PR 100266
* config/riscv/sync.md (riscv_load_reserved): New.
* config/riscv/sync.md (riscv_store_conditional): New.
---
gcc/config/riscv/sync.md | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/sync.md b/gcc/config/riscv/sync.md
index edff6520b87e..49b860da8ef0 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/sync.md
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/sync.md
@@ -125,6 +125,21 @@
"lr.<amo>%A2 %0, %1"
)
+;; This pattern allows to consume a sign-extension of the loaded value.
+;; This is legal, because the specification of LR.W defines the loaded
+;; value to be sign-extended.
+
+(define_insn "riscv_load_reserved"
+ [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
+ (sign_extend:DI
+ (unspec_volatile:SI
+ [(match_operand:SI 1 "memory_operand" "A")
+ (match_operand:SI 2 "const_int_operand")] ;; model
+ UNSPEC_LOAD_RESERVED)))]
+ "TARGET_ATOMIC && TARGET_64BIT"
+ "lr.w%A2 %0, %1"
+)
+
(define_insn "@riscv_store_conditional<mode>"
[(set (match_operand:GPR 0 "register_operand" "=&r")
(unspec_volatile:GPR [(const_int 0)] UNSPEC_STORE_CONDITIONAL))
@@ -137,6 +152,25 @@
"sc.<amo>%A3 %0, %z2, %1"
)
+;; This pattern allows to consume a sign-extension of the success
+;; value of SC.W, which can then be used for instructions which
+;; require values of XLEN-size (e.g. conditional branches).
+;; This is legal, because any non-zero value remains non-zero
+;; after sign-extension.
+
+(define_insn "riscv_store_conditional"
+ [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=&r")
+ (sign_extend:DI
+ (unspec_volatile:SI [(const_int 0)] UNSPEC_STORE_CONDITIONAL)))
+ (set (match_operand:SI 1 "memory_operand" "=A")
+ (unspec_volatile:SI
+ [(match_operand:SI 2 "reg_or_0_operand" "rJ")
+ (match_operand:SI 3 "const_int_operand")] ;; model
+ UNSPEC_STORE_CONDITIONAL))]
+ "TARGET_ATOMIC && TARGET_64BIT"
+ "sc.w%A3 %0, %z2, %1"
+)
+
(define_insn "atomic_<atomic_optab><mode>"
[(set (match_operand:GPR 0 "memory_operand" "+A")
(unspec_volatile:GPR
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-05 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-05 19:36 [PATCH v2 00/10] [RISC-V] Atomics improvements [PR100265/PR100266] Christoph Muellner
2021-05-05 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] RISC-V: Simplify memory model code [PR 100265] Christoph Muellner
2021-05-05 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] RISC-V: Emit proper memory ordering suffixes for AMOs " Christoph Muellner
2021-05-05 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] RISC-V: Eliminate %F specifier from riscv_print_operand() " Christoph Muellner
2021-05-05 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] RISC-V: Use STORE instead of AMOSWAP for atomic stores " Christoph Muellner
2021-05-05 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] RISC-V: Emit fences according to chosen memory model " Christoph Muellner
2021-05-05 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] RISC-V: Implement atomic_{load,store} " Christoph Muellner
2021-05-05 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] RISC-V: Model INSNs for LR and SC [PR 100266] Christoph Muellner
2021-05-05 19:36 ` Christoph Muellner [this message]
2021-05-05 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] RISC-V: Provide programmatic implementation of CAS " Christoph Muellner
2021-05-06 0:27 ` Jim Wilson
2021-05-05 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] RISC-V: Introduce predicate "riscv_sync_memory_operand" " Christoph Muellner
2022-10-11 19:06 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] [RISC-V] Atomics improvements [PR100265/PR100266] Vineet Gupta
2022-10-11 19:31 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-11 20:46 ` Christoph Müllner
2022-10-11 23:31 ` Vineet Gupta
2022-10-12 0:15 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-12 8:03 ` Christoph Müllner
2022-10-13 23:11 ` Jeff Law
2022-10-12 17:16 ` Andrea Parri
2022-10-20 19:01 ` Andrea Parri
2022-10-29 5:02 ` Jeff Law
2022-10-13 23:04 ` Jeff Law
2022-10-13 22:39 ` Jeff Law
2022-10-13 23:14 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-14 11:03 ` Christoph Müllner
2022-10-14 20:39 ` Jeff Law
2022-10-14 21:57 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-15 0:31 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-14 0:14 ` Vineet Gupta
2022-10-11 23:14 ` Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210505193651.2075405-9-cmuellner@gcc.gnu.org \
--to=cmuellner@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jimw@sifive.com \
--cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).