Re: [PATCH] testsuite: scev: expect fail on ilp32

[Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>]

> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:09:10 +0100

    Richard B.:
> > > In the end we might need to move/duplicate the test to some
> > > gcc.target/* dir and restrict it to a specific tuning.
> 
> I intend to post two alternative patches to get this
> resolved:
> 1: Move the tests to gcc.target/i386/scev-[3-5].c

Subject: [PATCH 1/2] testsuite: Fix XPASS for gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c, -4.c and -5.c [PR112786]

This is the first alternative, perhaps the more appropriate one.

Tested cris-elf, arm-eabi (default), x86_64-linux, ditto -m32,
h8300-elf and shle-linux; xpassing, skipped and passing as
applicable and intended.

Ok to commit?
-- >8 --
	PR testsuite/112786
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c, gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c,
	gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c: Revert last change and move...
	* gcc.target/i386/scev-3.c, gcc.target/i386/scev-4.c:
	gcc.target/i386/scev-5.c: ...here.
---
 gcc/testsuite/{gcc.dg/tree-ssa => gcc.target/i386}/scev-3.c | 3 +--
 gcc/testsuite/{gcc.dg/tree-ssa => gcc.target/i386}/scev-4.c | 3 +--
 gcc/testsuite/{gcc.dg/tree-ssa => gcc.target/i386}/scev-5.c | 3 +--
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 rename gcc/testsuite/{gcc.dg/tree-ssa => gcc.target/i386}/scev-3.c (80%)
 rename gcc/testsuite/{gcc.dg/tree-ssa => gcc.target/i386}/scev-4.c (81%)
 rename gcc/testsuite/{gcc.dg/tree-ssa => gcc.target/i386}/scev-5.c (81%)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-3.c
similarity index 80%
rename from gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c
rename to gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-3.c
index beea9aed9fe9..ac8c8d4519e3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-3.c
@@ -40,5 +40,4 @@ __BB(6):
 
 }
 
-/* Not all 32-bit systems fail this, but several do.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ilp32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ia32 } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-4.c
similarity index 81%
rename from gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c
rename to gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-4.c
index a97f75f81f65..b0d594053019 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-4.c
@@ -45,5 +45,4 @@ __BB(6):
 
 }
 
-/* Not all 32-bit systems fail this, but several do.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ilp32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ia32 } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-5.c
similarity index 81%
rename from gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c
rename to gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-5.c
index 08f4260403c4..c911a9298866 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/scev-5.c
@@ -40,5 +40,4 @@ __BB(6):
 
 }
 
-/* Not all 32-bit systems fail this, but several do.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ilp32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ia32 } } } */
-- 
2.30.2