public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: <oliva@adacore.com>, <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<botcazou@adacore.com>, <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
	<ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>, <mikestump@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] testsuite: scev: expect fail on ilp32
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 17:33:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231207163345.1A90A2041E@pchp3.se.axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <198q96q6-9os5-o2ro-9559-5875n86495r2@fhfr.qr> (message from Richard Biener on Mon, 4 Dec 2023 12:58:03 +0100 (CET))

> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 12:58:03 +0100 (CET)
> From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>

> On Sat, 2 Dec 2023, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > > Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 08:07:14 +0100 (CET)
> > > From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
> > > I read from your messages that the testcases pass on arm*-*-*?
> > Yes: they pass (currently XPASS) on arm-eabi and
> > arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi, default configurations.  But,
> > scev-3 and -5 fail with for example -mcpu=cortex-r5
> 
> I see.  As said, the testcases test for "cost" things, so that we
> "regressed" might mean we really "regressed" here.  Even the x86 -m32
> result is questionable.
> 
> Of course whether using a single IV makes sense for all archs is
> unknown.
> 
> Btw, if we turn the testcases into ones that are (sub-)target
> specific then we want to again use C code as input.
> 
> I think at this point we've lost track and I'm juggling between
> removing the testcases or moving them to a place they succeed
> (with some specific -mcpu=?)
> 
> Richard.

So to not drop the ball(s) on this, here's a patch with your
first alternative: remove them.

Ok?

-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: Remove gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c -4.c and 5.c

These tests were recently xfailed on ilp32 targets though
passing on almost all ilp32 targets (known exceptions: ia32
and some arm subtargets).  They've been changed around too
much to remain useful.

	PR testsuite/112786
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c, gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c,
	gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c: Remove.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c | 44 -----------------------
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c | 49 --------------------------
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c | 44 -----------------------
 3 files changed, 137 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c
 delete mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c
 delete mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c
deleted file mode 100644
index beea9aed9fe9..000000000000
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
-/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -fgimple -fdump-tree-ivopts" } */
-
-int *a_p;
-int a[1000];
-
-void __GIMPLE (ssa,startwith ("loop"))
-f (int k)
-{
-  int i;
-  int * _1;
-
-__BB(2):
-  i_5 = k_4(D);
-  if (i_5 <= 999)
-    goto __BB4;
-  else
-    goto __BB3;
-
-__BB(3):
-  return;
-
-__BB(4):
-  goto __BB5;
-
-__BB(5):
-  i_12 = __PHI (__BB6: i_9, __BB4: i_5);
-  _1 = &a[i_12];
-  a_p = _1;
-  __MEM <int[1000]> ((int *)&a)[i_12] = 100;
-  i_9 = i_5 + i_12;
-  if (i_9 <= 999)
-    goto __BB6;
-  else
-    goto __BB3;
-
-__BB(6):
-  ;
-  goto __BB5;
-
-}
-
-/* Not all 32-bit systems fail this, but several do.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ilp32 } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c
deleted file mode 100644
index a97f75f81f65..000000000000
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
-/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -fgimple -fdump-tree-ivopts" } */
-
-typedef struct {
-    int x;
-    int y;
-} S;
-
-int *a_p;
-S a[1000];
-
-void __GIMPLE (ssa, startwith ("loop"))
-f (int k)
-{
-  int i;
-  int * _1;
-
-__BB(2):
-  i_5 = k_4(D);
-  if (i_5 <= 999)
-    goto __BB4;
-  else
-    goto __BB3;
-
-__BB(3):
-  return;
-
-__BB(4):
-  goto __BB5;
-
-__BB(5):
-  i_12 = __PHI (__BB6: i_9, __BB4: i_5);
-  _1 = &a[i_12].y;
-  a_p = _1;
-  __MEM <S[1000]> ((int *)&a)[i_12].y = 100;
-  i_9 = i_5 + i_12;
-  if (i_9 <= 999)
-    goto __BB6;
-  else
-    goto __BB3;
-
-__BB(6):
-  ;
-  goto __BB5;
-
-}
-
-/* Not all 32-bit systems fail this, but several do.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ilp32 } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 08f4260403c4..000000000000
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
-/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -fgimple -fdump-tree-ivopts" } */
-
-int *a_p;
-int a[1000];
-
-void __GIMPLE (ssa,startwith ("loop"))
-f (int k)
-{
-  long long int i;
-  int * _1;
-
-__BB(2):
-  i_5 = (long long int) k_4(D);
-  if (i_5 <= 999ll)
-    goto __BB4;
-  else
-    goto __BB3;
-
-__BB(3):
-  return;
-
-__BB(4):
-  goto __BB5;
-
-__BB(5):
-  i_12 = __PHI (__BB6: i_9, __BB4: i_5);
-  _1 = &a[i_12];
-  a_p = _1;
-  __MEM <int[1000]> ((int *)&a)[i_12] = 100;
-  i_9 = i_5 + i_12;
-  if (i_9 <= 999ll)
-    goto __BB6;
-  else
-    goto __BB3;
-
-__BB(6):
-  ;
-  goto __BB5;
-
-}
-
-/* Not all 32-bit systems fail this, but several do.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ilp32 } } } */
-- 
2.30.2


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-07 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-19  7:30 Alexandre Oliva
2023-11-19 15:12 ` Jeff Law
2023-11-20  7:35   ` Richard Biener
2023-11-28 15:13     ` Rainer Orth
2023-11-29 18:00       ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-11-30  4:41         ` Alexandre Oliva
2023-11-30  8:32           ` Richard Biener
2023-11-30 17:09           ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-12-01  2:38             ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-12-01  3:35             ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-12-01  7:07               ` Richard Biener
2023-12-01 23:18                 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-12-04 11:58                   ` Richard Biener
2023-12-07 16:33                     ` Hans-Peter Nilsson [this message]
2023-12-07 21:03                       ` Jeff Law
2023-12-08  6:46                       ` Richard Biener
2023-12-01  3:41             ` Hans-Peter Nilsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231207163345.1A90A2041E@pchp3.se.axis.com \
    --to=hp@axis.com \
    --cc=botcazou@adacore.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=mikestump@comcast.net \
    --cc=oliva@adacore.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).