Re: [PATCH] testsuite: scev: expect fail on ilp32

[Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>]

On 12/7/23 09:33, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 12:58:03 +0100 (CET)
>> From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
> 
>> On Sat, 2 Dec 2023, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>>>> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 08:07:14 +0100 (CET)
>>>> From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
>>>> I read from your messages that the testcases pass on arm*-*-*?
>>> Yes: they pass (currently XPASS) on arm-eabi and
>>> arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi, default configurations.  But,
>>> scev-3 and -5 fail with for example -mcpu=cortex-r5
>>
>> I see.  As said, the testcases test for "cost" things, so that we
>> "regressed" might mean we really "regressed" here.  Even the x86 -m32
>> result is questionable.
>>
>> Of course whether using a single IV makes sense for all archs is
>> unknown.
>>
>> Btw, if we turn the testcases into ones that are (sub-)target
>> specific then we want to again use C code as input.
>>
>> I think at this point we've lost track and I'm juggling between
>> removing the testcases or moving them to a place they succeed
>> (with some specific -mcpu=?)
>>
>> Richard.
> 
> So to not drop the ball(s) on this, here's a patch with your
> first alternative: remove them.
> 
> Ok?
OK, but give Richard until Monday PM to chime in if he wants to try and 
save them by putting them into a target specific directory.

jeff