public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] testsuite: btf: Fix btf-datasec-1.c for RISC-V
@ 2022-05-04  0:27 Palmer Dabbelt
  2022-05-11  1:31 ` Kito Cheng
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Palmer Dabbelt @ 2022-05-04  0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches

Similar to 37e65643d3e ("testsuite/101269: fix testcase when used with
-m32"), RISC-V needs to be told not to put symbols in the
sdata/srodata/sbss sections.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

	* debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c: Don't use small data on RISC-V.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
index dbb236bbda1..77df88648c5 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 /* { dg-do compile )  */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA -msdata=none" { target { { powerpc*-*-* } && ilp32 } } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA -msmall-data-limit=0" { target { riscv*-*-* } } } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA -G0" { target { nios2-*-* } } } */
 
 /* Check for two DATASEC entries with vlen 3, and one with vlen 1.  */
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] testsuite: btf: Fix btf-datasec-1.c for RISC-V
  2022-05-04  0:27 [PATCH] testsuite: btf: Fix btf-datasec-1.c for RISC-V Palmer Dabbelt
@ 2022-05-11  1:31 ` Kito Cheng
  2022-05-13 16:53   ` Palmer Dabbelt
  2022-09-10  4:10   ` Mike Stump
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kito Cheng @ 2022-05-11  1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Palmer Dabbelt; +Cc: GCC Patches

LGTM, that's only added a new option for RISC-V and won't affect all
other targets, so I assume I can approve that.

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 8:27 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> Similar to 37e65643d3e ("testsuite/101269: fix testcase when used with
> -m32"), RISC-V needs to be told not to put symbols in the
> sdata/srodata/sbss sections.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>
>         * debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c: Don't use small data on RISC-V.
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
> index dbb236bbda1..77df88648c5 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  /* { dg-do compile )  */
>  /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
>  /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA -msdata=none" { target { { powerpc*-*-* } && ilp32 } } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA -msmall-data-limit=0" { target { riscv*-*-* } } } */
>  /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA -G0" { target { nios2-*-* } } } */
>
>  /* Check for two DATASEC entries with vlen 3, and one with vlen 1.  */
> --
> 2.34.1
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] testsuite: btf: Fix btf-datasec-1.c for RISC-V
  2022-05-11  1:31 ` Kito Cheng
@ 2022-05-13 16:53   ` Palmer Dabbelt
  2022-09-10  4:10   ` Mike Stump
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Palmer Dabbelt @ 2022-05-13 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kito Cheng; +Cc: gcc-patches

On Tue, 10 May 2022 18:31:37 PDT (-0700), Kito Cheng wrote:
> LGTM, that's only added a new option for RISC-V and won't affect all
> other targets, so I assume I can approve that.

I always forget what the rules are, but someone recently reminded me and 
yes that's the case.  I committed this.

Thanks!

>
> On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 8:27 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>>
>> Similar to 37e65643d3e ("testsuite/101269: fix testcase when used with
>> -m32"), RISC-V needs to be told not to put symbols in the
>> sdata/srodata/sbss sections.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>>
>>         * debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c: Don't use small data on RISC-V.
>> ---
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
>> index dbb236bbda1..77df88648c5 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>>  /* { dg-do compile )  */
>>  /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
>>  /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA -msdata=none" { target { { powerpc*-*-* } && ilp32 } } } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA -msmall-data-limit=0" { target { riscv*-*-* } } } */
>>  /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA -G0" { target { nios2-*-* } } } */
>>
>>  /* Check for two DATASEC entries with vlen 3, and one with vlen 1.  */
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] testsuite: btf: Fix btf-datasec-1.c for RISC-V
  2022-05-11  1:31 ` Kito Cheng
  2022-05-13 16:53   ` Palmer Dabbelt
@ 2022-09-10  4:10   ` Mike Stump
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Stump @ 2022-09-10  4:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kito Cheng; +Cc: Palmer Dabbelt, GCC Patches

On May 10, 2022, at 6:31 PM, Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> LGTM, that's only added a new option for RISC-V and won't affect all
> other targets, so I assume I can approve that.

Yes.  Usual and customary for ports.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-10  4:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-04  0:27 [PATCH] testsuite: btf: Fix btf-datasec-1.c for RISC-V Palmer Dabbelt
2022-05-11  1:31 ` Kito Cheng
2022-05-13 16:53   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-09-10  4:10   ` Mike Stump

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).