public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
To: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework option -mpowerpc64 handling [PR106680]
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 17:14:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F795875-4D05-4FFE-8DF2-50AF20E19139@sandoe.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <826f30b1-a3fe-4227-1874-5e4f5a1f6d56@linux.ibm.com>

Hi Kewen,

> On 29 Sep 2022, at 10:12, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> on 2022/9/29 16:16, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>> 

>>> I'm testing the attached diff which can be applied on top of the previous proposed patch
>>> on ppc64 and ppc64le, could you help to test it can fix the issue?
>> 
>> It does work on a cross from x86_64-darwin => powerpc-darwin, I can also do compile-only
>> tests there with a dummy board and the new tests pass with one minor tweak as described
>> below.

>> full regstrap on the G5 will take a day or so .. but I’ll do the C target tests first to get a heads up
> 
> Thanks!  I think the C target tests is enough for now. 

Bootstrap (powerpc-darwin9 on G5) succeeded and the C tests look nominal.

Cheers
Iain


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-29 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-28  5:30 Kewen.Lin
2022-09-28  6:37 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-28 16:18   ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-28 19:09     ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29  5:45       ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-29  8:16         ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29  9:12           ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-29 16:14             ` Iain Sandoe [this message]
2022-09-29 17:04           ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29 18:25             ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 18:37               ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-30  9:26                 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-29 17:11         ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-30 12:15           ` Kewen.Lin
2022-10-03 21:15             ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-10-10  2:15               ` Kewen.Lin
2022-10-10 13:58                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-10-12  8:26                   ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-28 21:30     ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-28 23:04       ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-28 23:16         ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 17:26           ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29 17:18         ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29 18:33           ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 18:50             ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-28 22:04 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29  6:16   ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-29 18:56     ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F795875-4D05-4FFE-8DF2-50AF20E19139@sandoe.co.uk \
    --to=iain@sandoe.co.uk \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).