public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location
@ 2022-04-27 12:28 Bruno Larsen
  2022-04-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind Bruno Larsen
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Larsen @ 2022-04-27 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

Changelog for v4:
  * rebased on master
  * removed unnecessary checking after Simon's patch

This started with what was thought of as an incorrect inheritance
location expression, but turned out to be a correct, but unusual
expression, and uncovered an incorrect assumption when calculating
offsets of baseclasses. 

This patchset is the new iteration of that solution, that changed
gnuv3_baseclass_offset calculation to allow for non-virtual inheritance
that has a non-trivial location expression and also moved the basic
validation to this function. The check in value_contents_copy_raw was
changed to an assert.
Finally, the test was expanded to have one incorrect trivial location,
and two non-trivial location expressions, one correct and one incorrect.

Bruno Larsen (2):
  [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind
  [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset

 gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c                              |  24 +-
 .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp  | 233 +++++++++++++++++
 .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp  | 235 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c      |  69 +++++
 gdb/value.c                                   |   8 +-
 5 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
 create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp
 create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c

-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 1/2] [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind
  2022-04-27 12:28 [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location Bruno Larsen
@ 2022-04-27 12:28 ` Bruno Larsen
  2022-04-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset Bruno Larsen
  2022-05-11 11:12 ` [PING] [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location Bruno Larsen
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Larsen @ 2022-04-27 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

DWARF specifications, when talking about C++ virtual classes, don't tie
their existance or non-existance to how the location is described, but
the original offset decoding did, assuming that we could use BITPOS for
non-virtual inheritance.

The new code assumes that if there isn't virtuality at play, we probably
have BITPOS, but we may need to calculate an expression, so allows for
fallthrough.

A new testcase was added, where we use a trivial locexpr instead of a
bitpos, to showcase one of this instances
---
 gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c                              |  15 +-
 .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp  | 233 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c      |  69 ++++++
 gdb/value.c                                   |   8 +-
 4 files changed, 319 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
 create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c

diff --git a/gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c b/gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c
index 7aac0ca4f9c..ae165afd8f2 100644
--- a/gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c
+++ b/gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c
@@ -458,10 +458,17 @@ gnuv3_baseclass_offset (struct type *type, int index,
   gdbarch = type->arch ();
   ptr_type = builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_data_ptr;
 
-  /* If it isn't a virtual base, this is easy.  The offset is in the
-     type definition.  */
-  if (!BASETYPE_VIA_VIRTUAL (type, index))
-    return TYPE_BASECLASS_BITPOS (type, index) / 8;
+  if (!BASETYPE_VIA_VIRTUAL (type, index)){
+      /* If it isn't a virtual base, this is easy.
+         The offset is probably in the type definition.
+	 However, the DWARF specification doesn't tie virtuality with location
+	 so we may need to resolve location expressions.
+	 To reuse code, we just fall-through in that case */
+      if (type->field (index).loc_kind () == FIELD_LOC_KIND_BITPOS){
+	  cur_base_offset = TYPE_BASECLASS_BITPOS (type, index) / 8;
+	return TYPE_BASECLASS_BITPOS (type, index) / 8;
+      }
+  }
 
   /* If we have a DWARF expression for the offset, evaluate it.  */
   if (type->field (index).loc_kind () == FIELD_LOC_KIND_DWARF_BLOCK)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..aa511a31a88
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+# Copyright 2018-2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+load_lib dwarf.exp
+
+# This test can only be run on targets which support DWARF-2 and use gas.
+if ![dwarf2_support] {
+    return 0
+}
+
+# We'll place the output of Dwarf::assemble in pr28030.S.
+standard_testfile dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c .S
+
+# ${testfile} is now "pr28030".  srcfile2 is "pr28030.S".
+set executable ${testfile}
+set asm_file [standard_output_file ${srcfile2}]
+
+# We need to know the size of integer and address types in order
+# to write some of the debugging info we'd like to generate.
+#
+# For that, we ask GDB by debugging our pr28030 program.
+# Any program would do, but since we already have pr28030
+# specifically for this testcase, might as well use that.
+if [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${testfile} ${srcfile}] {
+    return -1
+}
+set long_size [get_sizeof "long" -1]
+# gdb always assumes references are implemented as pointers.
+set addr_size [get_sizeof "void *" -1]
+set struct_A_size [get_sizeof "g_A" 4]
+set struct_B_size [get_sizeof "g_B" 4]
+set struct_C_size [get_sizeof "g_C" 4]
+
+# Create the DWARF.
+Dwarf::assemble $asm_file {
+    global srcdir subdir srcfile srcfile2
+    global long_size addr_size struct_A_size struct_B_size struct_C_size
+    declare_labels L
+
+    cu {} {
+	DW_TAG_compile_unit {
+	    {DW_AT_language @DW_LANG_C_plus_plus}
+	    {name pr28030.c}
+	    {stmt_list $L DW_FORM_sec_offset}
+        } {
+	    declare_labels int_label class_A_label class_B_label class_C_label
+
+	    int_label: DW_TAG_base_type {
+		{DW_AT_byte_size ${long_size} DW_FORM_udata}
+		{DW_AT_encoding @DW_ATE_signed}
+		{DW_AT_name "int"}
+	    }
+
+	    class_A_label: DW_TAG_class_type {
+		{DW_AT_name "A"}
+		{DW_AT_byte_size $struct_A_size DW_FORM_sdata}
+	    } {
+		DW_TAG_member {
+		    {DW_AT_name "a"}
+		    {DW_AT_type :$int_label}
+		    {DW_AT_data_member_location 0*$long_size DW_FORM_udata}
+		}
+		DW_TAG_member {
+		    {DW_AT_name "x"}
+		    {DW_AT_type :$int_label}
+		    {DW_AT_data_member_location 1*$long_size DW_FORM_udata}
+		}
+	    }
+
+	    class_B_label: DW_TAG_class_type {
+		{DW_AT_name "B"}
+		{DW_AT_byte_size $struct_B_size DW_FORM_sdata}
+	    } {
+		DW_TAG_inheritance {
+		    {DW_AT_type :$class_A_label}
+		    {DW_AT_data_member_location {
+			DW_OP_constu 0
+			DW_OP_plus
+			DW_OP_stack_value } SPECIAL_expr}
+		    {DW_AT_accessibility 1 DW_FORM_data1}
+		}
+		DW_TAG_member {
+		    {DW_AT_name "b"}
+		    {DW_AT_type :$int_label}
+		    {DW_AT_data_member_location 2*$long_size DW_FORM_udata}
+		}
+	    }
+
+	    class_C_label: DW_TAG_class_type {
+		{DW_AT_name "C"}
+		{DW_AT_byte_size $struct_C_size DW_FORM_sdata}
+	    } {
+		DW_TAG_inheritance {
+		    {DW_AT_type :$class_A_label}
+		    {DW_AT_data_member_location { DW_OP_constu 9000 } SPECIAL_expr}
+		    {DW_AT_accessibility 1 DW_FORM_data1}
+		}
+		DW_TAG_member {
+		    {DW_AT_name "b"}
+		    {DW_AT_type :$int_label}
+		    {DW_AT_data_member_location 2*$long_size DW_FORM_udata}
+		}
+	    }
+
+	    DW_TAG_variable {
+		{DW_AT_name "g_A"}
+		{DW_AT_type :$class_A_label}
+		{DW_AT_external 1 flag}
+		{DW_AT_location {DW_OP_addr [gdb_target_symbol "g_A"]} SPECIAL_expr}
+	    }
+
+	    DW_TAG_variable {
+		{DW_AT_name "g_B"}
+		{DW_AT_type :$class_B_label}
+		{DW_AT_external 1 flag}
+		{DW_AT_location {DW_OP_addr [gdb_target_symbol "g_B"]} SPECIAL_expr}
+	    }
+
+	    DW_TAG_variable {
+		{DW_AT_name "g_C"}
+		{DW_AT_type :$class_C_label}
+		{DW_AT_external 1 flag}
+		{DW_AT_location {DW_OP_addr [gdb_target_symbol "g_C"]} SPECIAL_expr}
+	    }
+
+	    DW_TAG_subprogram {
+		{MACRO_AT_func { "foo" }}
+		{DW_AT_type :${class_B_label}}
+		{DW_AT_external 1 flag}
+	    }
+	    DW_TAG_subprogram {
+		{MACRO_AT_func { "bar" }}
+		{DW_AT_type :${class_C_label}}
+		{DW_AT_external 1 flag}
+	    }
+	    DW_TAG_subprogram {
+		{MACRO_AT_func { "main" }}
+		{DW_AT_type :${int_label}}
+		{DW_AT_external 1 DW_FORM_flag}
+	    }
+	}
+    }
+
+    lines {version 2} L {
+	include_dir "${srcdir}/${subdir}"
+	file_name "$srcfile" 1
+
+	lassign [function_range main [list ${srcdir}/${subdir}/$srcfile]] \
+	    main_start main_len
+	set main_end "$main_start + $main_len"
+	lassign [function_range foo [list ${srcdir}/${subdir}/$srcfile]] \
+	    foo_start foo_len
+	set foo_end "$foo_start + $foo_len"
+	lassign [function_range bar [list ${srcdir}/${subdir}/$srcfile]] \
+	    bar_start bar_len
+	set bar_end "$bar_start + $bar_len"
+
+	# Generate a line table program.  An attempt was made to make it
+	# reasonably accurate as it made debugging the test case easier.
+	program {
+	    DW_LNE_set_address $main_start
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "main prologue"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address main_label
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "main foo call"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address main_bar_label
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "main bar call"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address main_label2
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "main return"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address $main_end
+	    line [expr [gdb_get_line_number "main end"] + 1]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_end_sequence
+
+	    DW_LNE_set_address $foo_start
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "foo prologue"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address foo_label
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "foo return"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "foo end"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address $foo_end
+	    DW_LNS_advance_line 1
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_end_sequence
+
+	    DW_LNE_set_address $bar_start
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "bar prologue"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address bar_label
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "bar return"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "bar end"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address $bar_end
+	    DW_LNS_advance_line 1
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_end_sequence
+
+	}
+    }
+}
+
+if [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${executable} [list ${asm_file} ${srcfile}] {}] {
+    return -1
+}
+
+if ![runto_main] {
+    return -1
+}
+
+gdb_test "step" "foo .. at .* foo end.*" "step into foo"
+gdb_test "finish" "= {<A> = {a = 5, x = 6}, b = 7}" "finish out of foo"
+
+if ![runto_main] {
+    return -1
+}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0de0cb04b34
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+/* Copyright (C) 2018-2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+   This file is part of GDB.
+
+   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+   the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+   (at your option) any later version.
+
+   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+   GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+   along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
+
+typedef struct A {
+    long a;
+    long x;
+} A;
+
+struct A g_A = {3, 4};
+
+typedef struct B {
+    long a;
+    long x;
+    long b;
+} B;
+
+struct B g_B = { 5, 6, 7 };
+
+typedef struct C {
+    long a;
+    long x;
+    long b;
+} C;
+
+struct C g_C = { 8, 9, 10 };
+
+B
+foo ()
+{						/* foo prologue */
+  asm ("foo_label: .globl foo_label");
+  return g_B;					/* foo return */
+}						/* foo end */
+
+C
+bar()
+{						/* bar prologue */
+  asm ("bar_label: .globl bar_label");
+  return g_C;					/* bar return */
+}						/* bar end */
+
+int
+main (void)
+{						/* main prologue */
+  B v;
+  C ret;
+  asm ("main_label: .globl main_label");
+
+  v = foo ();					/* main foo call */
+
+  asm ("main_bar_label: .globl main_bar_label");
+  ret = bar();					/* main bar call */
+
+  asm ("main_label2: .globl main_label2");
+  return 0;					/* main return */
+}						/* main end */
diff --git a/gdb/value.c b/gdb/value.c
index 08cccf711b2..14b4ff9ef91 100644
--- a/gdb/value.c
+++ b/gdb/value.c
@@ -3085,8 +3085,12 @@ value_primitive_field (struct value *arg1, LONGEST offset,
 
       /* We special case virtual inheritance here because this
 	 requires access to the contents, which we would rather avoid
-	 for references to ordinary fields of unavailable values.  */
-      if (BASETYPE_VIA_VIRTUAL (arg_type, fieldno))
+	 for references to ordinary fields of unavailable values.  
+	 TODO: we should probably try to change this special case, we are
+	 starting to add validation to baseclass_offset.
+	 */
+      if (BASETYPE_VIA_VIRTUAL (arg_type, fieldno) || 
+	  arg_type->field (fieldno).loc_kind () != FIELD_LOC_KIND_BITPOS)
 	boffset = baseclass_offset (arg_type, fieldno,
 				    value_contents (arg1).data (),
 				    value_embedded_offset (arg1),
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 2/2] [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset
  2022-04-27 12:28 [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location Bruno Larsen
  2022-04-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind Bruno Larsen
@ 2022-04-27 12:28 ` Bruno Larsen
  2022-05-11 11:12 ` [PING] [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location Bruno Larsen
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Larsen @ 2022-04-27 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

Add a sinple validation to gnuv3_baseclass_offset when not dealing with
virtual inheritance. The validation is simply checking if the offset is
bigger than the size of the variable.

An assert was also added to value_contents_copy_raw, in gdb/value.c, to
ensure that no data from outside the src value is copied, and that we
dont copy to outside the dst variable.

A test case was added that has incorrect location expressions and tests
that the addresses are correctly identified as invalid.
---
 gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c                              |   9 +-
 .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp  | 235 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp

diff --git a/gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c b/gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c
index ae165afd8f2..6b3ae62a793 100644
--- a/gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c
+++ b/gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c
@@ -466,6 +466,8 @@ gnuv3_baseclass_offset (struct type *type, int index,
 	 To reuse code, we just fall-through in that case */
       if (type->field (index).loc_kind () == FIELD_LOC_KIND_BITPOS){
 	  cur_base_offset = TYPE_BASECLASS_BITPOS (type, index) / 8;
+	  if (cur_base_offset >= TYPE_LENGTH (type))
+	    error (_("Incorrect offset of baseclass"));
 	return TYPE_BASECLASS_BITPOS (type, index) / 8;
       }
   }
@@ -491,7 +493,12 @@ gnuv3_baseclass_offset (struct type *type, int index,
       CORE_ADDR result;
       if (dwarf2_evaluate_property (&prop, nullptr, &addr_stack, &result,
 				    {addr_stack.addr}))
-	return (int) (result - addr_stack.addr);
+	{
+	  if (!BASETYPE_VIA_VIRTUAL (type, index) &&
+	      (result - addr_stack.addr) >= TYPE_LENGTH (type))
+	    error (_("overly large offset in non-virtual member"));
+	  return (int) (result - addr_stack.addr);
+        }
     }
 
   /* To access a virtual base, we need to use the vbase offset stored in
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c9cdba252c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp
@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+# Copyright 2018-2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+load_lib dwarf.exp
+
+# This test can only be run on targets which support DWARF-2 and use gas.
+if ![dwarf2_support] {
+    return 0
+}
+
+# We'll place the output of Dwarf::assemble in pr28030.S.
+standard_testfile dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c .S
+
+# ${testfile} is now "pr28030".  srcfile2 is "pr28030.S".
+set executable ${testfile}
+set asm_file [standard_output_file ${srcfile2}]
+
+# We need to know the size of integer and address types in order
+# to write some of the debugging info we'd like to generate.
+#
+# For that, we ask GDB by debugging our pr28030 program.
+# Any program would do, but since we already have pr28030
+# specifically for this testcase, might as well use that.
+if [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${testfile} ${srcfile}] {
+    return -1
+}
+set long_size [get_sizeof "long" -1]
+# gdb always assumes references are implemented as pointers.
+set addr_size [get_sizeof "void *" -1]
+set struct_A_size [get_sizeof "g_A" 4]
+set struct_B_size [get_sizeof "g_B" 4]
+set struct_C_size [get_sizeof "g_C" 4]
+
+# Create the DWARF.
+Dwarf::assemble ${asm_file} {
+    global srcdir subdir srcfile srcfile2
+    global long_size addr_size struct_A_size struct_B_size struct_C_size
+    declare_labels L
+
+    cu {} {
+	DW_TAG_compile_unit {
+	    {DW_AT_language @DW_LANG_C_plus_plus}
+	    {name pr28030.c}
+	    {stmt_list $L DW_FORM_sec_offset}
+        } {
+	    declare_labels int_label class_A_label class_B_label class_C_label
+
+	    int_label: DW_TAG_base_type {
+		{DW_AT_byte_size ${long_size} DW_FORM_udata}
+		{DW_AT_encoding @DW_ATE_signed}
+		{DW_AT_name "int"}
+	    }
+
+	    class_A_label: DW_TAG_class_type {
+		{DW_AT_name "A"}
+		{DW_AT_byte_size $struct_A_size DW_FORM_sdata}
+	    } {
+		DW_TAG_member {
+		    {DW_AT_name "a"}
+		    {DW_AT_type :$int_label}
+		    {DW_AT_data_member_location 0*$long_size DW_FORM_udata}
+		}
+		DW_TAG_member {
+		    {DW_AT_name "x"}
+		    {DW_AT_type :$int_label}
+		    {DW_AT_data_member_location 1*$long_size DW_FORM_udata}
+		}
+	    }
+
+	    class_B_label: DW_TAG_class_type {
+		{DW_AT_name "B"}
+		{DW_AT_byte_size $struct_B_size DW_FORM_sdata}
+	    } {
+		DW_TAG_inheritance {
+		    {DW_AT_type :$class_A_label}
+		    {DW_AT_data_member_location {
+			DW_OP_constu 9000
+			DW_OP_plus
+			DW_OP_stack_value } SPECIAL_expr}
+		    {DW_AT_accessibility 1 DW_FORM_data1}
+		}
+		DW_TAG_member {
+		    {DW_AT_name "b"}
+		    {DW_AT_type :$int_label}
+		    {DW_AT_data_member_location 2*$long_size DW_FORM_udata}
+		}
+	    }
+
+	    class_C_label: DW_TAG_class_type {
+		{DW_AT_name "C"}
+		{DW_AT_byte_size $struct_C_size DW_FORM_sdata}
+	    } {
+		DW_TAG_inheritance {
+		    {DW_AT_type :$class_A_label}
+		    {DW_AT_data_member_location { DW_OP_constu 9000 } SPECIAL_expr}
+		    {DW_AT_accessibility 1 DW_FORM_data1}
+		}
+		DW_TAG_member {
+		    {DW_AT_name "b"}
+		    {DW_AT_type :$int_label}
+		    {DW_AT_data_member_location 2*$long_size DW_FORM_udata}
+		}
+	    }
+
+	    DW_TAG_variable {
+		{DW_AT_name "g_A"}
+		{DW_AT_type :$class_A_label}
+		{DW_AT_external 1 flag}
+		{DW_AT_location {DW_OP_addr [gdb_target_symbol "g_A"]} SPECIAL_expr}
+	    }
+
+	    DW_TAG_variable {
+		{DW_AT_name "g_B"}
+		{DW_AT_type :$class_B_label}
+		{DW_AT_external 1 flag}
+		{DW_AT_location {DW_OP_addr [gdb_target_symbol "g_B"]} SPECIAL_expr}
+	    }
+
+	    DW_TAG_variable {
+		{DW_AT_name "g_C"}
+		{DW_AT_type :$class_C_label}
+		{DW_AT_external 1 flag}
+		{DW_AT_location {DW_OP_addr [gdb_target_symbol "g_C"]} SPECIAL_expr}
+	    }
+
+	    DW_TAG_subprogram {
+		{MACRO_AT_func { "foo" }}
+		{DW_AT_type :${class_B_label}}
+		{DW_AT_external 1 flag}
+	    }
+	    DW_TAG_subprogram {
+		{MACRO_AT_func { "bar" }}
+		{DW_AT_type :${class_C_label}}
+		{DW_AT_external 1 flag}
+	    }
+	    DW_TAG_subprogram {
+		{MACRO_AT_func { "main" }}
+		{DW_AT_type :${int_label}}
+		{DW_AT_external 1 DW_FORM_flag}
+	    }
+	}
+    }
+
+    lines {version 2} L {
+	include_dir "${srcdir}/${subdir}"
+	file_name "$srcfile" 1
+
+	lassign [function_range main [list ${srcdir}/${subdir}/$srcfile]] \
+	    main_start main_len
+	set main_end "$main_start + $main_len"
+	lassign [function_range foo [list ${srcdir}/${subdir}/$srcfile]] \
+	    foo_start foo_len
+	set foo_end "$foo_start + $foo_len"
+	lassign [function_range bar [list ${srcdir}/${subdir}/$srcfile]] \
+	    bar_start bar_len
+	set bar_end "$bar_start + $bar_len"
+
+	# Generate a line table program.  An attempt was made to make it
+	# reasonably accurate as it made debugging the test case easier.
+	program {
+	    DW_LNE_set_address $main_start
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "main prologue"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address main_label
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "main foo call"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address main_bar_label
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "main bar call"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address main_label2
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "main return"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address $main_end
+	    line [expr [gdb_get_line_number "main end"] + 1]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_end_sequence
+
+	    DW_LNE_set_address $foo_start
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "foo prologue"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address foo_label
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "foo return"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "foo end"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address $foo_end
+	    DW_LNS_advance_line 1
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_end_sequence
+
+	    DW_LNE_set_address $bar_start
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "bar prologue"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address bar_label
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "bar return"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    line [gdb_get_line_number "bar end"]
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_set_address $bar_end
+	    DW_LNS_advance_line 1
+	    DW_LNS_copy
+	    DW_LNE_end_sequence
+
+	}
+    }
+}
+
+if [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${executable} [list ${asm_file} ${srcfile}] {}] {
+    return -1
+}
+
+if ![runto_main] {
+    return -1
+}
+
+gdb_test "step" "foo .. at .* foo end.*" "step into foo"
+gdb_test "finish" "= {<A> = <invalid address>, b = 7}" "finish out of foo"
+gdb_test "step" "bar .. at .* bar end.*" "step into bar"
+gdb_test "finish" "= {<A> = <invalid address>, b = 10}" "finish out of bar"
+
+if ![runto_main] {
+    return -1
+}
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PING] [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location
  2022-04-27 12:28 [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location Bruno Larsen
  2022-04-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind Bruno Larsen
  2022-04-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset Bruno Larsen
@ 2022-05-11 11:12 ` Bruno Larsen
  2022-05-18 11:24   ` [PINGv2] " Bruno Larsen
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Larsen @ 2022-05-11 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

Ping

Cheers!
Bruno Larsen

On 4/27/22 09:28, Bruno Larsen wrote:
> Changelog for v4:
>    * rebased on master
>    * removed unnecessary checking after Simon's patch
> 
> This started with what was thought of as an incorrect inheritance
> location expression, but turned out to be a correct, but unusual
> expression, and uncovered an incorrect assumption when calculating
> offsets of baseclasses.
> 
> This patchset is the new iteration of that solution, that changed
> gnuv3_baseclass_offset calculation to allow for non-virtual inheritance
> that has a non-trivial location expression and also moved the basic
> validation to this function. The check in value_contents_copy_raw was
> changed to an assert.
> Finally, the test was expanded to have one incorrect trivial location,
> and two non-trivial location expressions, one correct and one incorrect.
> 
> Bruno Larsen (2):
>    [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind
>    [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset
> 
>   gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c                              |  24 +-
>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp  | 233 +++++++++++++++++
>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp  | 235 ++++++++++++++++++
>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c      |  69 +++++
>   gdb/value.c                                   |   8 +-
>   5 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp
>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PINGv2] [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location
  2022-05-11 11:12 ` [PING] [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location Bruno Larsen
@ 2022-05-18 11:24   ` Bruno Larsen
  2022-05-24 11:26     ` [PINGv3] " Bruno Larsen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Larsen @ 2022-05-18 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

ping

Cheers!
Bruno Larsen

On 5/11/22 08:12, Bruno Larsen wrote:
> Ping
> 
> Cheers!
> Bruno Larsen
> 
> On 4/27/22 09:28, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>> Changelog for v4:
>>    * rebased on master
>>    * removed unnecessary checking after Simon's patch
>>
>> This started with what was thought of as an incorrect inheritance
>> location expression, but turned out to be a correct, but unusual
>> expression, and uncovered an incorrect assumption when calculating
>> offsets of baseclasses.
>>
>> This patchset is the new iteration of that solution, that changed
>> gnuv3_baseclass_offset calculation to allow for non-virtual inheritance
>> that has a non-trivial location expression and also moved the basic
>> validation to this function. The check in value_contents_copy_raw was
>> changed to an assert.
>> Finally, the test was expanded to have one incorrect trivial location,
>> and two non-trivial location expressions, one correct and one incorrect.
>>
>> Bruno Larsen (2):
>>    [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind
>>    [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset
>>
>>   gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c                              |  24 +-
>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp  | 233 +++++++++++++++++
>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp  | 235 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c      |  69 +++++
>>   gdb/value.c                                   |   8 +-
>>   5 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp
>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c
>>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PINGv3] [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location
  2022-05-18 11:24   ` [PINGv2] " Bruno Larsen
@ 2022-05-24 11:26     ` Bruno Larsen
  2022-05-30 11:15       ` [PINGv4] " Bruno Larsen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Larsen @ 2022-05-24 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

ping

Cheers!
Bruno Larsen

On 5/18/22 08:24, Bruno Larsen wrote:
> ping
> 
> Cheers!
> Bruno Larsen
> 
> On 5/11/22 08:12, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>> Ping
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Bruno Larsen
>>
>> On 4/27/22 09:28, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>> Changelog for v4:
>>>    * rebased on master
>>>    * removed unnecessary checking after Simon's patch
>>>
>>> This started with what was thought of as an incorrect inheritance
>>> location expression, but turned out to be a correct, but unusual
>>> expression, and uncovered an incorrect assumption when calculating
>>> offsets of baseclasses.
>>>
>>> This patchset is the new iteration of that solution, that changed
>>> gnuv3_baseclass_offset calculation to allow for non-virtual inheritance
>>> that has a non-trivial location expression and also moved the basic
>>> validation to this function. The check in value_contents_copy_raw was
>>> changed to an assert.
>>> Finally, the test was expanded to have one incorrect trivial location,
>>> and two non-trivial location expressions, one correct and one incorrect.
>>>
>>> Bruno Larsen (2):
>>>    [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind
>>>    [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset
>>>
>>>   gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c                              |  24 +-
>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp  | 233 +++++++++++++++++
>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp  | 235 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c      |  69 +++++
>>>   gdb/value.c                                   |   8 +-
>>>   5 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp
>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c
>>>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PINGv4] [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location
  2022-05-24 11:26     ` [PINGv3] " Bruno Larsen
@ 2022-05-30 11:15       ` Bruno Larsen
  2022-06-06 12:45         ` [PINGv5] " Bruno Larsen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Larsen @ 2022-05-30 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

ping

Cheers!
Bruno Larsen

On 5/24/22 08:26, Bruno Larsen wrote:
> ping
> 
> Cheers!
> Bruno Larsen
> 
> On 5/18/22 08:24, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>> ping
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Bruno Larsen
>>
>> On 5/11/22 08:12, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>> Ping
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>> Bruno Larsen
>>>
>>> On 4/27/22 09:28, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>>> Changelog for v4:
>>>>    * rebased on master
>>>>    * removed unnecessary checking after Simon's patch
>>>>
>>>> This started with what was thought of as an incorrect inheritance
>>>> location expression, but turned out to be a correct, but unusual
>>>> expression, and uncovered an incorrect assumption when calculating
>>>> offsets of baseclasses.
>>>>
>>>> This patchset is the new iteration of that solution, that changed
>>>> gnuv3_baseclass_offset calculation to allow for non-virtual inheritance
>>>> that has a non-trivial location expression and also moved the basic
>>>> validation to this function. The check in value_contents_copy_raw was
>>>> changed to an assert.
>>>> Finally, the test was expanded to have one incorrect trivial location,
>>>> and two non-trivial location expressions, one correct and one incorrect.
>>>>
>>>> Bruno Larsen (2):
>>>>    [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind
>>>>    [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset
>>>>
>>>>   gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c                              |  24 +-
>>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp  | 233 +++++++++++++++++
>>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp  | 235 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c      |  69 +++++
>>>>   gdb/value.c                                   |   8 +-
>>>>   5 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
>>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp
>>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c
>>>>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PINGv5] [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location
  2022-05-30 11:15       ` [PINGv4] " Bruno Larsen
@ 2022-06-06 12:45         ` Bruno Larsen
  2022-06-13 20:03           ` [PINGv6] " Bruno Larsen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Larsen @ 2022-06-06 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

ping!

Cheers!
Bruno Larsen

On 5/30/22 08:15, Bruno Larsen wrote:
> ping
> 
> Cheers!
> Bruno Larsen
> 
> On 5/24/22 08:26, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>> ping
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Bruno Larsen
>>
>> On 5/18/22 08:24, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>> ping
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>> Bruno Larsen
>>>
>>> On 5/11/22 08:12, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>>> Ping
>>>>
>>>> Cheers!
>>>> Bruno Larsen
>>>>
>>>> On 4/27/22 09:28, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>>>> Changelog for v4:
>>>>>    * rebased on master
>>>>>    * removed unnecessary checking after Simon's patch
>>>>>
>>>>> This started with what was thought of as an incorrect inheritance
>>>>> location expression, but turned out to be a correct, but unusual
>>>>> expression, and uncovered an incorrect assumption when calculating
>>>>> offsets of baseclasses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patchset is the new iteration of that solution, that changed
>>>>> gnuv3_baseclass_offset calculation to allow for non-virtual inheritance
>>>>> that has a non-trivial location expression and also moved the basic
>>>>> validation to this function. The check in value_contents_copy_raw was
>>>>> changed to an assert.
>>>>> Finally, the test was expanded to have one incorrect trivial location,
>>>>> and two non-trivial location expressions, one correct and one incorrect.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruno Larsen (2):
>>>>>    [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind
>>>>>    [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset
>>>>>
>>>>>   gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c                              |  24 +-
>>>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp  | 233 +++++++++++++++++
>>>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp  | 235 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c      |  69 +++++
>>>>>   gdb/value.c                                   |   8 +-
>>>>>   5 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
>>>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp
>>>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c
>>>>>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PINGv6] [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location
  2022-06-06 12:45         ` [PINGv5] " Bruno Larsen
@ 2022-06-13 20:03           ` Bruno Larsen
  2022-06-20 13:28             ` [PINGv7] " Bruno Larsen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Larsen @ 2022-06-13 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

ping!

Cheers!
Bruno Larsen

On 6/6/22 09:45, Bruno Larsen wrote:
> ping!
> 
> Cheers!
> Bruno Larsen
> 
> On 5/30/22 08:15, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>> ping
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Bruno Larsen
>>
>> On 5/24/22 08:26, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>> ping
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>> Bruno Larsen
>>>
>>> On 5/18/22 08:24, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>>> ping
>>>>
>>>> Cheers!
>>>> Bruno Larsen
>>>>
>>>> On 5/11/22 08:12, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>>>> Ping
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>> Bruno Larsen
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/27/22 09:28, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>>>>> Changelog for v4:
>>>>>>    * rebased on master
>>>>>>    * removed unnecessary checking after Simon's patch
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This started with what was thought of as an incorrect inheritance
>>>>>> location expression, but turned out to be a correct, but unusual
>>>>>> expression, and uncovered an incorrect assumption when calculating
>>>>>> offsets of baseclasses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patchset is the new iteration of that solution, that changed
>>>>>> gnuv3_baseclass_offset calculation to allow for non-virtual inheritance
>>>>>> that has a non-trivial location expression and also moved the basic
>>>>>> validation to this function. The check in value_contents_copy_raw was
>>>>>> changed to an assert.
>>>>>> Finally, the test was expanded to have one incorrect trivial location,
>>>>>> and two non-trivial location expressions, one correct and one incorrect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bruno Larsen (2):
>>>>>>    [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind
>>>>>>    [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c                              |  24 +-
>>>>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp  | 233 +++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp  | 235 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c      |  69 +++++
>>>>>>   gdb/value.c                                   |   8 +-
>>>>>>   5 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
>>>>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp
>>>>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c
>>>>>>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PINGv7] [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location
  2022-06-13 20:03           ` [PINGv6] " Bruno Larsen
@ 2022-06-20 13:28             ` Bruno Larsen
  2022-06-27 11:24               ` [PINGv8] " Bruno Larsen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Larsen @ 2022-06-20 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

ping!

Cheers!
Bruno Larsen

On 6/13/22 17:03, Bruno Larsen wrote:
> ping!
> 
> Cheers!
> Bruno Larsen
> 
> On 6/6/22 09:45, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>> ping!
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Bruno Larsen
>>
>> On 5/30/22 08:15, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>> ping
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>> Bruno Larsen
>>>
>>> On 5/24/22 08:26, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>>> ping
>>>>
>>>> Cheers!
>>>> Bruno Larsen
>>>>
>>>> On 5/18/22 08:24, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>>>> ping
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>> Bruno Larsen
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/11/22 08:12, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>>>>> Ping
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>> Bruno Larsen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/27/22 09:28, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>>>>>> Changelog for v4:
>>>>>>>    * rebased on master
>>>>>>>    * removed unnecessary checking after Simon's patch
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This started with what was thought of as an incorrect inheritance
>>>>>>> location expression, but turned out to be a correct, but unusual
>>>>>>> expression, and uncovered an incorrect assumption when calculating
>>>>>>> offsets of baseclasses.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patchset is the new iteration of that solution, that changed
>>>>>>> gnuv3_baseclass_offset calculation to allow for non-virtual inheritance
>>>>>>> that has a non-trivial location expression and also moved the basic
>>>>>>> validation to this function. The check in value_contents_copy_raw was
>>>>>>> changed to an assert.
>>>>>>> Finally, the test was expanded to have one incorrect trivial location,
>>>>>>> and two non-trivial location expressions, one correct and one incorrect.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bruno Larsen (2):
>>>>>>>    [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind
>>>>>>>    [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c                              |  24 +-
>>>>>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp  | 233 +++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp  | 235 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c      |  69 +++++
>>>>>>>   gdb/value.c                                   |   8 +-
>>>>>>>   5 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
>>>>>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp
>>>>>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c
>>>>>>>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PINGv8] [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location
  2022-06-20 13:28             ` [PINGv7] " Bruno Larsen
@ 2022-06-27 11:24               ` Bruno Larsen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Larsen @ 2022-06-27 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

ping!

Cheers!
Bruno Larsen

On 6/20/22 10:28, Bruno Larsen wrote:
> ping!
> 
> Cheers!
> Bruno Larsen
> 
> On 6/13/22 17:03, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>> ping!
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Bruno Larsen
>>
>> On 6/6/22 09:45, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>> ping!
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>> Bruno Larsen
>>>
>>> On 5/30/22 08:15, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>>> ping
>>>>
>>>> Cheers!
>>>> Bruno Larsen
>>>>
>>>> On 5/24/22 08:26, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>>>> ping
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>> Bruno Larsen
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/18/22 08:24, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>>>>> ping
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>> Bruno Larsen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/11/22 08:12, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>>>>>> Ping
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>>> Bruno Larsen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/27/22 09:28, Bruno Larsen wrote:
>>>>>>>> Changelog for v4:
>>>>>>>>    * rebased on master
>>>>>>>>    * removed unnecessary checking after Simon's patch
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This started with what was thought of as an incorrect inheritance
>>>>>>>> location expression, but turned out to be a correct, but unusual
>>>>>>>> expression, and uncovered an incorrect assumption when calculating
>>>>>>>> offsets of baseclasses.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This patchset is the new iteration of that solution, that changed
>>>>>>>> gnuv3_baseclass_offset calculation to allow for non-virtual inheritance
>>>>>>>> that has a non-trivial location expression and also moved the basic
>>>>>>>> validation to this function. The check in value_contents_copy_raw was
>>>>>>>> changed to an assert.
>>>>>>>> Finally, the test was expanded to have one incorrect trivial location,
>>>>>>>> and two non-trivial location expressions, one correct and one incorrect.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bruno Larsen (2):
>>>>>>>>    [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind
>>>>>>>>    [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c                              |  24 +-
>>>>>>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp  | 233 +++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp  | 235 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>   .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c      |  69 +++++
>>>>>>>>   gdb/value.c                                   |   8 +-
>>>>>>>>   5 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
>>>>>>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp
>>>>>>>>   create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c
>>>>>>>>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-27 11:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-27 12:28 [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location Bruno Larsen
2022-04-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind Bruno Larsen
2022-04-27 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset Bruno Larsen
2022-05-11 11:12 ` [PING] [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location Bruno Larsen
2022-05-18 11:24   ` [PINGv2] " Bruno Larsen
2022-05-24 11:26     ` [PINGv3] " Bruno Larsen
2022-05-30 11:15       ` [PINGv4] " Bruno Larsen
2022-06-06 12:45         ` [PINGv5] " Bruno Larsen
2022-06-13 20:03           ` [PINGv6] " Bruno Larsen
2022-06-20 13:28             ` [PINGv7] " Bruno Larsen
2022-06-27 11:24               ` [PINGv8] " Bruno Larsen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).