public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug tui/31522] TUI misses highlight after run to main
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:26:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-31522-4717-rcnEg6wNWT@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-31522-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31522
--- Comment #14 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
(In reply to Pedro Alves from comment #3)
> > This seems reasonable to me, but maybe it is a change if
> > you exit the TUI and then re-enter it in some scenario.
> > Personally I'm not too concerned about this.
>
> I do that frequently with c-x,a. I'll be debugging gdb, and
> stepping/nexting with the TUI enabled, then decide I'm at the right spot the
> program that I want to inspect variables or run a command [...]
What I meant here is that I was wondering if there are cases
where "tui disable" + "tui enable" would preserve the state of
the source window, even if there were changes (like stepping,
whatever) in between.
I tend to think that it is fine for "tui enable" to just recenter
the selected frame's line -- but is that ok with you?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-28 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-21 15:57 [Bug tui/31522] New: " pedro at palves dot net
2024-03-21 16:19 ` [Bug tui/31522] " ssbssa at sourceware dot org
2024-03-21 16:19 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-03-22 16:24 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-03-25 23:18 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-03-25 23:18 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-03-26 0:26 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-03-26 13:15 ` pedro at palves dot net
2024-03-27 1:10 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-03-27 8:33 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-27 22:35 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-03-28 10:33 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-28 11:07 ` pedro at palves dot net
2024-03-28 12:00 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-28 14:34 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-28 14:35 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-28 14:50 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-28 16:43 ` pedro at palves dot net
2024-03-28 22:26 ` tromey at sourceware dot org [this message]
2024-04-02 14:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-02 14:10 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-31522-4717-rcnEg6wNWT@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).