From: David Herron <David.Herron@Sun.COM>
To: Lillian Angel <langel@redhat.com>
Cc: "Steve McKay☄" <smckay@google.com>, mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Tweaking default java.awt.Robot settings
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46F96193.7080202@sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46F95489.3080101@redhat.com>
Lillian Angel wrote:
> David Herron wrote:
>> [resending because the mailing list thingy told me I had to use only
>> plain text messages...]
>>
>> Hmmm.. here's the meat of the test
>>
>> public void runTest(int code, char chr)
>> {
>> KeyEvent e = new KeyEvent(f, KeyEvent.KEY_PRESSED, 0, 0, code,
>> chr, KeyEvent.KEY_LOCATION_STANDARD);
>> f.dispatchEvent(e);
>> f.setSize(200,200);
>> f.show();
>> r.mouseMove(60, 60);
>>
>> r.keyPress(code);
>> r.keyRelease(code);
>> h.check(key, (int) chr);
>> }
>>
>> I don't understand this. If you're going to create a Java event why
>> use Robot, or vice versa...?
>
> The test was done this way to determine if the right key was pressed.
> See the inner class (myFrame) which has 1 function (keyDown) which
> sets a variable (key) to the key that was pressed.
>
> While it might be incorrect, I am unsure how else we can determine
> that the correct key was pressed without dispatching an event.
>
> Lillian
>
Maybe I misread the code in my brief look.
The side effect of using Robot to keyPress and keyRelease should be the
dispatch of two KeyEvent's. That's why I said those two lines should
go, because the way I read it they're masking whether Robot successfully
delivered the KeyEvent's.
- David Herron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-25 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-24 20:31 Steve McKay☄
2007-09-24 20:50 ` David Herron
2007-09-24 21:22 ` Steve McKay☄
2007-09-24 21:41 ` David Herron
2007-09-25 18:33 ` Lillian Angel
2007-09-25 19:13 ` Steve McKay☄
2007-09-25 19:27 ` Lillian Angel
2007-09-25 19:37 ` Steve McKay☄
2007-09-25 19:45 ` Lillian Angel
2007-09-25 19:27 ` David Herron [this message]
2007-09-25 18:33 ` Thomas Fitzsimmons
2007-09-25 18:57 ` Steve McKay☄
2007-09-25 19:58 ` Thomas Fitzsimmons
2007-09-25 20:28 ` Steve McKay☄
2007-10-04 0:43 ` Steve McKay☄
2007-10-04 13:04 ` Lillian Angel
2007-09-25 19:24 ` David Herron
2007-09-25 18:10 ` Thomas Fitzsimmons
2007-09-25 18:14 ` Steve McKay☄
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46F96193.7080202@sun.com \
--to=david.herron@sun.com \
--cc=langel@redhat.com \
--cc=mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=smckay@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).