From: Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon@thenilgiris.com>
To: Skeezics Boondoggle <skeezics@q7.com>, xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: fighters fighting without ammo
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 08:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0312080950290F.16811@thenilgiris.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312070811360.19370-100000@q7.q7.com>
On Sunday 07 December 2003 22:24, Skeezics Boondoggle wrote:
> I'm looking forward to some of the AI improvements, but y'know, most times
> I like to just take a break and "go conquer the world" so it's kind of
> relaxing to just swarm over the map and blast everything to bits. :-)
>
> But improving the AI's ability to use a more balanced approach to air, sea
> and land power would probably improve its chances quite a bit. It tends
> to go nuts and build lots of one thing, then build lots of the next thing,
> rarely seems to put up air patrols, never has destroyer screens to defend
> coastal cities, and too often sends out waves of transports completely
> undefended, where they're almost always picked up (first by fighters, then
> by destroyers, as bombers are brought in to blow them away) way before
> they reach landfall. And losing full transports is expensive, obviously.
>
> I guess if the AIs start to get smarter I'll have to work a little harder.
try the modern game - more evenly matched
--
regards
kg
http://www.ootygolfclub.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-08 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-07 16:07 Kenneth Gonsalves
2003-12-07 16:54 ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-07 17:36 ` Jim Kingdon
2003-12-07 18:13 ` Skeezics Boondoggle
2003-12-07 23:54 ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-12-13 5:11 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-13 10:57 ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-12-13 12:02 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-13 19:55 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-13 20:02 ` Jim Kingdon
2003-12-14 4:33 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-08 8:19 ` Kenneth Gonsalves [this message]
2003-12-13 4:59 ` Eric McDonald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0312080950290F.16811@thenilgiris.com \
--to=lawgon@thenilgiris.com \
--cc=skeezics@q7.com \
--cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).