public inbox for xconq7@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon@thenilgiris.com>
To: Skeezics Boondoggle <skeezics@q7.com>, xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: fighters fighting without ammo
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 08:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0312080950290F.16811@thenilgiris.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312070811360.19370-100000@q7.q7.com>

On Sunday 07 December 2003 22:24, Skeezics Boondoggle wrote:

> I'm looking forward to some of the AI improvements, but y'know, most times
> I like to just take a break and "go conquer the world" so it's kind of
> relaxing to just swarm over the map and blast everything to bits.  :-)
>
> But improving the AI's ability to use a more balanced approach to air, sea
> and land power would probably improve its chances quite a bit.  It tends
> to go nuts and build lots of one thing, then build lots of the next thing,
> rarely seems to put up air patrols, never has destroyer screens to defend
> coastal cities, and too often sends out waves of transports completely
> undefended, where they're almost always picked up (first by fighters, then
> by destroyers, as bombers are brought in to blow them away) way before
> they reach landfall.  And losing full transports is expensive, obviously.
>
> I guess if the AIs start to get smarter I'll have to work a little harder.
try the modern game - more evenly matched
-- 
regards
kg

http://www.ootygolfclub.org

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-12-08  3:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-07 16:07 Kenneth Gonsalves
2003-12-07 16:54 ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-07 17:36 ` Jim Kingdon
2003-12-07 18:13   ` Skeezics Boondoggle
2003-12-07 23:54     ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-12-13  5:11       ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-13 10:57         ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-12-13 12:02           ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-13 19:55             ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-13 20:02             ` Jim Kingdon
2003-12-14  4:33               ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-08  8:19     ` Kenneth Gonsalves [this message]
2003-12-13  4:59     ` Eric McDonald

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0312080950290F.16811@thenilgiris.com \
    --to=lawgon@thenilgiris.com \
    --cc=skeezics@q7.com \
    --cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).