public inbox for xconq7@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruno Boettcher <bboett@adlp.org>
To: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Reduced Visibility Table?
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 15:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031202111956.GI1378@adlp.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <l03130301bbf17da9b001@[212.181.162.155]>

On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Hans Ronne wrote:
> >since reading this.... is there a way to let those units coexist with
> >enemy units in the same cell?
> >
> >i would relly like to use the subs to act as spies and make some
> >commando operations, but since allready a fighter barrage can detect
> >them, it makes not much sense....
> 
> True. If you fire into the dark you may hit enemy units that are sitting
> out there, even if you cannot see them. Which makes sense. If we were to
> make invisible units invulnerable as well, they would become way too
> powerful.
ah but i don't mean to make them invulnerable! i mean certain classes of
ships have higher probabilities to detect those units, and i am not
against the fact that the units are hit by some chance when someone
fires into their cell, but i don't want them to be attacked automaticly
and thu detcted when an enemy unit enters that cell, that makes it way
to easy to detect them....

often i see this: my fighter barrage can't enter a cell? send some more
figthers there and ooops! ther the sub was and appears.... not the thing
i thought about...

-- 
ciao bboett
==============================================================
bboett@adlp.org
http://inforezo.u-strasbg.fr/~bboett
===============================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-02 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-01 22:35 Elijah Meeks
2003-12-01 23:18 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02  1:09   ` Elijah Meeks
2003-12-02  4:02     ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-01 23:23 ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-12-01 23:27   ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-01 23:43     ` Stan Shebs
2003-12-02  0:30       ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02  0:54         ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-02  0:58           ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02  4:46       ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-02  4:04     ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-02  4:16       ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-02 20:56       ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-03  2:41         ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-03  3:04           ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-03 21:13             ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-01 23:32   ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02 15:04     ` Bruno Boettcher [this message]
2003-12-02 19:57       ` Emmanuel Fritsch
2003-12-03  2:12         ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-03  2:22       ` Eric McDonald

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031202111956.GI1378@adlp.org \
    --to=bboett@adlp.org \
    --cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).