From: Emmanuel Fritsch <emmanuel.fritsch@ign.fr>
To: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Reduced Visibility Table?
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 19:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FCCABE8.AD93CC30@ign.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031202111956.GI1378@adlp.org>
Bruno Boettcher a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Hans Ronne wrote:
> > >since reading this.... is there a way to let those units coexist with
> > >enemy units in the same cell?
> > >
> > >i would relly like to use the subs to act as spies and make some
> > >commando operations, but since allready a fighter barrage can detect
> > >them, it makes not much sense....
> >
> > True. If you fire into the dark you may hit enemy units that are sitting
> > out there, even if you cannot see them. Which makes sense. If we were to
> > make invisible units invulnerable as well, they would become way too
> > powerful.
It is not invisible and invulnerable against all unit type, but again
some kinds of units. For instance subs may not hit fighter, and may
not be seen by fighter. Or Satellite may see ground units, but no
hit may be possible from one to another, and the cell containing
a satellite (even hostile) should allways be free for ground units.
Or another example : aircraft should be able to jump over a line of
small guerilla in order to bomb further. When I played xconq, bombers
needed to destroy the first units to grab a hole in ground lines, as
if ground units were ten thousand kilometer high.
The impossibility to jump over a continuous line of defender was
a great limit of xconq, for at least all modern games where aerial
and submarine operation are designed. Is it possible to solve this
difficulty ?
a+
manu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-02 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-01 22:35 Elijah Meeks
2003-12-01 23:18 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02 1:09 ` Elijah Meeks
2003-12-02 4:02 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-01 23:23 ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-12-01 23:27 ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-01 23:43 ` Stan Shebs
2003-12-02 0:30 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02 0:54 ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-02 0:58 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02 4:46 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-02 4:04 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-02 4:16 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-02 20:56 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-03 2:41 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-03 3:04 ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-03 21:13 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-01 23:32 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02 15:04 ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-12-02 19:57 ` Emmanuel Fritsch [this message]
2003-12-03 2:12 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-03 2:22 ` Eric McDonald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FCCABE8.AD93CC30@ign.fr \
--to=emmanuel.fritsch@ign.fr \
--cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).