From: Hans Ronne <hronne@comhem.se>
To: bboett@adlp.org
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Reduced Visibility Table?
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 23:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <l03130301bbf17da9b001@[212.181.162.155]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031201231823.GH1378@adlp.org>
>On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:14:25PM -0800, Elijah Meeks wrote:
>> Is there a way to make units less visible--submarines
>> and spies, for example, that could only be seen by
>> adjacent units (Even if the other unit has a visual
>> range higher than 1)?
>since reading this.... is there a way to let those units coexist with
>enemy units in the same cell?
>
>i would relly like to use the subs to act as spies and make some
>commando operations, but since allready a fighter barrage can detect
>them, it makes not much sense....
True. If you fire into the dark you may hit enemy units that are sitting
out there, even if you cannot see them. Which makes sense. If we were to
make invisible units invulnerable as well, they would become way too
powerful.
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-01 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-01 22:35 Elijah Meeks
2003-12-01 23:18 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02 1:09 ` Elijah Meeks
2003-12-02 4:02 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-01 23:23 ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-12-01 23:27 ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-01 23:43 ` Stan Shebs
2003-12-02 0:30 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02 0:54 ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-02 0:58 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02 4:46 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-02 4:04 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-02 4:16 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-02 20:56 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-03 2:41 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-03 3:04 ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-03 21:13 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-01 23:32 ` Hans Ronne [this message]
2003-12-02 15:04 ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-12-02 19:57 ` Emmanuel Fritsch
2003-12-03 2:12 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-03 2:22 ` Eric McDonald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='l03130301bbf17da9b001@[212.181.162.155]' \
--to=hronne@comhem.se \
--cc=bboett@adlp.org \
--cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).