public inbox for xconq7@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu>
To: Lincoln Peters <sampln@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: bboett@adlp.org, Xconq list <xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Reduced Visibility Table?
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 04:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312012253050.3913-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1070321096.9357.140.camel@odysseus>

Hello,

On 1 Dec 2003, Lincoln Peters wrote:

> > enemy units in the same cell?
> 
> You can make any unit exert zero ZOC (Zone of Control). 

I thought it was -1 to make a unit exert only ZOC over itself, and 
0 to make it exert over its cell. I use -1 ZOC in Bellum to create 
the very effect Elijah is asking about.

> However, the
> last time I looked at games that used this (which was before the new
> pathfinding algorithm was introduced), units still tried to go around
> invisible enemy units with no ZOC, even though they could not
> theoretically see those enemy units!

And I have seen cases where an undiscovered unit that could 
normally be attacked by the unit trying to enter its ZOC instead 
simply blocks the entering unit rather than starting combat with 
it. I think this is a bug, and it is on my list of things to do.

Eric

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-12-02  4:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-01 22:35 Elijah Meeks
2003-12-01 23:18 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02  1:09   ` Elijah Meeks
2003-12-02  4:02     ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-01 23:23 ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-12-01 23:27   ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-01 23:43     ` Stan Shebs
2003-12-02  0:30       ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02  0:54         ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-02  0:58           ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02  4:46       ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-02  4:04     ` Eric McDonald [this message]
2003-12-02  4:16       ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-02 20:56       ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-03  2:41         ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-03  3:04           ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-03 21:13             ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-01 23:32   ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02 15:04     ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-12-02 19:57       ` Emmanuel Fritsch
2003-12-03  2:12         ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-03  2:22       ` Eric McDonald

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0312012253050.3913-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu \
    --to=mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu \
    --cc=bboett@adlp.org \
    --cc=sampln@sbcglobal.net \
    --cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).