From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu>
To: Stan Shebs <shebs@apple.com>
Cc: Xconq list <xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Reduced Visibility Table?
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 04:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312012306520.3913-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FCBCF93.7070406@apple.com>
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Stan Shebs wrote:
> Heh, it's very messy coding to have a unit be there and not there at the
> same time.
> AI, UI, plan, and task code should only ever iterate over the stack of
> images,
> never over the real units. Action prep sometimes needs to know,
> sometimes not,
> which is part of the messiness.
As long as we have Stan's attention :-) and we are talking about
plan and task code, I do recall Hans seeking comment on the
rationale for broadcasting tasks in the network code. Also, while
we're on the subject, why is there some entanglement between what
I believe Peter referred to as "referee code" and "AI code"?
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-02 4:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-01 22:35 Elijah Meeks
2003-12-01 23:18 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02 1:09 ` Elijah Meeks
2003-12-02 4:02 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-01 23:23 ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-12-01 23:27 ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-01 23:43 ` Stan Shebs
2003-12-02 0:30 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02 0:54 ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-02 0:58 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02 4:46 ` Eric McDonald [this message]
2003-12-02 4:04 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-02 4:16 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-02 20:56 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-03 2:41 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-03 3:04 ` Lincoln Peters
2003-12-03 21:13 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-01 23:32 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-02 15:04 ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-12-02 19:57 ` Emmanuel Fritsch
2003-12-03 2:12 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-03 2:22 ` Eric McDonald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0312012306520.3913-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu \
--to=mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu \
--cc=shebs@apple.com \
--cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).