From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
Project Archer <archer@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: ptrace improvement: PTRACE_O_INHERIT
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110216195213.GD15576@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110216182807.CA9491806E0@magilla.sf.frob.com>
On 02/16, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > That may be too asynchronous. After GDB/gcore/etc. finishes new PTRACE_ATTACH
> > must complete successfully. I never know if it is already guaranteed or not
> > but in practice it works now.
>
> Sorry if I was unclear, that is not the kind of asynchrony I was talking
> about. It is guaranteed now that when PTRACE_DETACH succeeds, the tracee
> is detached and can be attached anew. That would be true of what I
> suggested also. The asynchrony I mean is the good kind: that it doesn't
> have to be stopped for you to detach it.
>
> There is nothing special for a debugger to worry about with this
> asynchrony
Yes, but I can' understand the next part:
> unless it uses multiple threads where one thread calls wait*
> while another thread calls ptrace. In that case, the debugger's wait*
> thread could see a stop result that appears to be after its other thread
> detached the same tracee. (That is already true now with PTRACE_DETACH.)
> If the debugger's own wait* call is strictly ordered after its detaching
> ptrace call, there can be no such confusion.
Could you spell please?
Just curious.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-03 22:39 ptrace improvement ideas Roland McGrath
2011-02-04 18:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-04 18:58 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-07 21:11 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-08 1:58 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-08 20:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-09 2:48 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-08 21:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-08 23:18 ` hw_breakpoint userland interface Roland McGrath
2011-02-10 21:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-10 21:14 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-11 20:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-10 20:00 ` ptrace improvement: PTRACE_O_INHERIT Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-11 19:24 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-11 20:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-12 0:59 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-12 19:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-14 19:31 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-14 19:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-15 0:36 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-15 13:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-15 21:43 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-15 21:56 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-16 19:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-16 19:45 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-16 20:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-16 20:16 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-19 19:48 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-19 20:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-20 8:18 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-20 21:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-21 19:54 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-22 19:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-22 20:49 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-22 21:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-22 22:16 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-21 19:44 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-15 22:02 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-16 16:02 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-16 18:28 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-16 20:00 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-02-16 20:07 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-16 20:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-16 19:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-16 20:02 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-16 20:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-16 20:31 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-16 21:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-16 21:51 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-16 19:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-16 19:40 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-15 22:17 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-16 20:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-16 11:31 ` ptrace improvement ideas (QPassSignals) Jan Kratochvil
2011-02-16 18:36 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-16 20:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-18 20:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110216195213.GD15576@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=archer@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).