public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>
To: Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>,
	Nelson Chu <nelson@rivosinc.com>,
	Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] RISC-V: Improve "bits undefined" diagnostics
Date: Thu,  6 Oct 2022 09:56:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1665050099.git.research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1665031170.git.research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>

Hello,

This small patch intends to improve one of the internal diagnostic messages
when an invalid RISC-V instruction is defined in riscv-opc.c.

Tracker on GitHub:
<https://github.com/a4lg/binutils-gdb/wiki/riscv_gas_diag_unused_bits>

It was a very low-priority patch but since commit bb996692bd9 "RISC-V/gas:
allow generating up to 176-bit instructions with .insn" can break
validate_riscv_insn function (by negative shift width), it'a good chance to
improve this function entirely.


[Changes: v2 -> v3]

-   PATCH 1/2: Revised the function description to reflect
    the specification.
-   PATCH 2/2: Started using "%#llx" instead of "0x%llx".
    In this occurrence, it will not change the behavior.

Both changes are based on the feedback from Jan Beulich.



This is mostly a quote from the cover letter of PATCH v1 but the words
"PATCH 1/2" are replaced with "PATCH 2/2" to reflect PATCH v2 and v3.


> First -- just to experiment -- we change mask value of "fcvt.d.s"
> instruction from MASK_FCVT_D_S|MASK_RM to MASK_FCVT_D_S while not touching
> operands "D,S" and we run compiled assembler, we get following message:
>
>     Assembler messages:
>     Error: internal: bad RISC-V opcode (bits 0xffffffff00007000 undefined): fcvt.d.s D,S
>     Fatal error: internal: broken assembler.  No assembly attempted
>
> Bits 0x7000 corresponds to rm (rounding mode) bits we just removed and no
> corresponding operands are found (making definition of fcvt.d.s instruction
> invalid).
>
> Then, what about 0xffffffff00000000 (upper 32-bits)?
> Yes, they are non-instruction bits.  Because of ~ (bitwise complement)
> operator while computing undefined bits, it also displays non-instruction
> bits.
>
>
> This patchset (PATCH 2/2) changes how undefined/invalid bits are computed.
>
> before:
>     ~(used & required)
> after:
>     (used ^ required)
>
> After PATCH 2/2, following error message is generated.
>
>     Assembler messages:
>     Error: internal: bad RISC-V opcode (bits 0x7000 undefined or invalid): fcvt.d.s D,S
>     Fatal error: internal: broken assembler.  No assembly attempted
>
>
> Note that we are testing for "undefined or invalid" bits here, not just
> undefined bits.  In fact, if we corrupt a variant of c.addi instruction with
> ADDITIONAL "j" operand (which is an immediate for I-type instruction, upper
> 12-bits of **32-bit** instruction encoding), we get following message:
>
>     Assembler messages:
>     Error: internal: bad RISC-V opcode (bits 0xfff00000 undefined or invalid): addi d,CU,Cj,j
>     Fatal error: internal: broken assembler.  No assembly attempted
>
> Okay, extra "j" operand generates "extra" bits (that should not have been
> defined considering its 16-bit encoding) and words "undefined or invalid"
> are working here.  We are correctly capturing invalid extra bits.  Before
> this patch, invalid bits are hidden by 0xffffffffffff0000 (48 non-
> instruction bits).


Thanks,
Tsukasa




Tsukasa OI (2):
  RISC-V: Fallback for instructions longer than 64b
  RISC-V: Improve "bits undefined" diagnostics

 gas/config/tc-riscv.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)


base-commit: 80e0c6dc91f52fad32c3ff3cf20da889d77013ac
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-06  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-09  3:50 [PATCH " Tsukasa OI
2022-07-09  3:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Tsukasa OI
2022-07-09  3:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] RISC-V: Fix required bits on certain environments Tsukasa OI
2022-10-06  4:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] RISC-V: Improve "bits undefined" diagnostics Tsukasa OI
2022-10-06  4:40   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] RISC-V: Fallback for instructions longer than 64b Tsukasa OI
2022-10-06  8:22     ` Jan Beulich
2022-10-06  9:52       ` Tsukasa OI
2022-10-06  4:40   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] RISC-V: Improve "bits undefined" diagnostics Tsukasa OI
2022-10-06  8:26     ` Jan Beulich
2022-10-06  8:34       ` Tsukasa OI
2022-10-06  8:43         ` Jan Beulich
2022-10-06  9:56   ` Tsukasa OI [this message]
2022-10-06  9:56     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] RISC-V: Fallback for instructions longer than 64b Tsukasa OI
2022-10-14  1:32       ` Nelson Chu
2022-10-14  7:07         ` Jan Beulich
2022-10-16 13:32         ` Tsukasa OI
2022-10-28  9:41           ` Nelson Chu
2022-10-06  9:56     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] RISC-V: Improve "bits undefined" diagnostics Tsukasa OI

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1665050099.git.research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com \
    --to=research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
    --cc=nelson@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).