public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>
To: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>,
	 Christoph Muellner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
	 Andrew Waterman <andrew@sifive.com>,
	Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 08/10] ifcvt: add if-conversion to conditional-zero instructions
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 15:07:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+=Sn1=3Z2hLaVaumXBVD5rAG5kXryPunxZ7x+PMRFmq0_KY2w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230210224150.2801962-9-philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 2:47 PM Philipp Tomsich
<philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> wrote:
>
> Some architectures, as it the case on RISC-V with the proposed
> ZiCondOps and the vendor-defined XVentanaCondOps, define a
> conditional-zero instruction that is equivalent to:
>  - the positive form:  rd = (rc != 0) ? rs : 0
>  - the negated form:   rd = (rc == 0) ? rs : 0
>
> While noce_try_store_flag_mask will somewhat work for this case, it
> will generate a number of atomic RTX that will misdirect the cost
> calculation and may be too long (i.e., 4 RTX and more) to successfully
> merge at combine-time.

Can you expand on this? Especially when there are patterns that use
(if_then_else) already.

>
> Instead, we add two new transforms that attempt to build up what we
> define as the canonical form of a conditional-zero expression:
>
>   (set (match_operand 0 "register_operand" "=r")
>        (and (neg (eq_or_ne (match_operand 1 "register_operand" "r")
>                            (const_int 0)))
>             (match_operand 2 "register_operand" "r")))

Again why are you not using:
(set (reg) (if_then_else (eq_ne (reg) (const_int 0)) (reg) (const_int 0)))
Form instead of the really bad "canonical" form of the above?

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

>
> Architectures that provide a conditional-zero are thus expected to
> define an instruction matching this pattern in their backend.
>
> Based on this, we support the following cases:
>  - noce_try_condzero:
>       a ? a : b
>       a ? b : 0  (and then/else swapped)
>      !a ? b : 0  (and then/else swapped)
>  - noce_try_condzero_arith:
>      conditional-plus, conditional-minus, conditional-and,
>      conditional-or, conditional-xor, conditional-shift,
>      conditional-and
>
> Given that this is hooked into the CE passes, it is less powerful than
> a tree-pass (e.g., it can not transform cases where an extension, such
> as for uint16_t operations is in either the then or else-branch
> together with the arithmetic) but already covers a good array of cases
> and triggers across SPEC CPU 2017.
>
> Adding transformations in a tree pass should come in a future
> improvement.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>         * ifcvt.cc (noce_emit_insn): Add prototype.
>         (noce_emit_condzero): Helper for noce_try_condzero and
>         noce_try_condzero_arith transforms.
>         (noce_try_condzero): New transform.
>         (noce_try_condzero_arith): New transform for conditional
>         arithmetic that can be built up by exploiting that the
>         conditional-zero instruction will inject 0, which acts
>         as the neutral element for operations.
>         (noce_process_if_block): Call noce_try_condzero and
>         noce_try_condzero_arith.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>         * gcc.target/riscv/xventanacondops-and-01.c: New test.
>         * gcc.target/riscv/xventanacondops-and-02.c: New test.
>         * gcc.target/riscv/xventanacondops-eq-01.c: New test.
>         * gcc.target/riscv/xventanacondops-eq-02.c: New test.
>         * gcc.target/riscv/xventanacondops-lt-01.c: New test.
>         * gcc.target/riscv/xventanacondops-ne-01.c: New test.
>         * gcc.target/riscv/xventanacondops-xor-01.c: New test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>
> ---
>
>  gcc/ifcvt.cc                                  | 216 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../gcc.target/riscv/zicond-and-01.c          |  16 ++
>  .../gcc.target/riscv/zicond-and-02.c          |  15 ++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-eq-01.c |  11 +
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-eq-02.c |  14 ++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-lt-01.c |  16 ++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ne-01.c |  10 +
>  .../gcc.target/riscv/zicond-xor-01.c          |  14 ++
>  8 files changed, 312 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-and-01.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-and-02.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-eq-01.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-eq-02.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-lt-01.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ne-01.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-xor-01.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/ifcvt.cc b/gcc/ifcvt.cc
> index 008796838f7..7ac3bd8f18e 100644
> --- a/gcc/ifcvt.cc
> +++ b/gcc/ifcvt.cc
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ static int find_if_case_2 (basic_block, edge, edge);
>  static int dead_or_predicable (basic_block, basic_block, basic_block,
>                                edge, int);
>  static void noce_emit_move_insn (rtx, rtx);
> +static rtx_insn *noce_emit_insn (rtx);
>  static rtx_insn *block_has_only_trap (basic_block);
>  static void need_cmov_or_rewire (basic_block, hash_set<rtx_insn *> *,
>                                  hash_map<rtx_insn *, int> *);
> @@ -787,6 +788,9 @@ static rtx noce_get_alt_condition (struct noce_if_info *, rtx, rtx_insn **);
>  static int noce_try_minmax (struct noce_if_info *);
>  static int noce_try_abs (struct noce_if_info *);
>  static int noce_try_sign_mask (struct noce_if_info *);
> +static rtx noce_emit_condzero (struct noce_if_info *, rtx, bool = false);
> +static int noce_try_condzero (struct noce_if_info *);
> +static int noce_try_condzero_arith (struct noce_if_info *);
>
>  /* Return the comparison code for reversed condition for IF_INFO,
>     or UNKNOWN if reversing the condition is not possible.  */
> @@ -1664,6 +1668,214 @@ noce_try_addcc (struct noce_if_info *if_info)
>    return FALSE;
>  }
>
> +/* Helper to noce_try_condzero: cond ? a : 0. */
> +static rtx
> +noce_emit_condzero (struct noce_if_info *if_info, rtx a, bool reverse)
> +{
> +  /* The canonical form for a conditional-zero-or-value is:
> +       (set (match_operand 0 "register_operand" "=r")
> +           (and (neg (eq_or_ne (match_operand 1 "register_operand" "r")
> +                               (const_int 0)))
> +                (match_operand 2 "register_operand" "r")))
> +   */
> +
> +  machine_mode opmode = GET_MODE (if_info->x);
> +  enum rtx_code code = GET_CODE (if_info->cond);
> +  rtx cond;
> +  rtx op_a = XEXP (if_info->cond, 0);
> +  rtx op_b = XEXP (if_info->cond, 1);
> +
> +  /* If it is not a EQ/NE comparison against const0_rtx, canonicalize
> +     by first synthesizing a truth-value and then building a NE
> +     condition around it. */
> +  if ((code != EQ && code != NE) || XEXP (if_info->cond, 1) != const0_rtx)
> +    {
> +      rtx tmp = gen_reg_rtx (opmode);
> +
> +      start_sequence ();
> +      cond = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (code, opmode, op_a, op_b);
> +      if (!noce_emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (tmp, cond)))
> +       {
> +         end_sequence ();
> +
> +         /* If we can't emit this pattern, try to reverse it and
> +            invert the polarity of the second test. */
> +         start_sequence ();
> +         cond = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (reverse_condition (code), opmode, op_a, op_b);
> +         if (!noce_emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (tmp, cond))) {
> +           end_sequence ();
> +           return NULL_RTX;
> +         }
> +
> +         /* We have recovered by reversing the first comparison,
> +            so we need change the second one around as well... */
> +         reverse = !reverse;
> +       }
> +      rtx_insn *seq = get_insns ();
> +      end_sequence ();
> +      emit_insn (seq);
> +
> +      /* Set up the second comparison that will be embedded in the
> +        canonical conditional-zero-or-value RTX. */
> +      code = NE;
> +      op_a = tmp;
> +      op_b = const0_rtx;
> +    }
> +
> +  cond = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (reverse ? reverse_condition (code) : code,
> +                        opmode, op_a, op_b);
> +
> +  /* Build (and (neg (eq_or_ne ... const0_rtx)) (reg <a>)) */
> +  rtx target = gen_reg_rtx (opmode);
> +  rtx czero = gen_rtx_AND (opmode, gen_rtx_NEG (opmode, cond), a);
> +  noce_emit_move_insn (target, czero);
> +
> +  return target;
> +}
> +
> +/* Use a conditional-zero instruction for "if (test) x = 0;", if available. */
> +static int
> +noce_try_condzero (struct noce_if_info *if_info)
> +{
> +  rtx target;
> +  rtx_insn *seq;
> +  int reversep = 0;
> +  /* Keep local copies of the constituent elements of if_info, as we
> +     may be changing them.  We are not allowed to modify if_info
> +     though, as we may fail in this function and can't leave different
> +     semantics behind for the next functions.  */
> +  rtx a = if_info->a;
> +  rtx b = if_info->b;
> +  rtx x = if_info->x;
> +  rtx cond = if_info->cond;
> +  enum rtx_code code = GET_CODE (cond);
> +  rtx cond_arg0 = XEXP (cond, 0);
> +  rtx cond_arg1 = XEXP (cond, 1);
> +  rtx orig_b = NULL_RTX;
> +
> +  if (!noce_simple_bbs (if_info))
> +    return FALSE;
> +
> +  /* We may encounter the form "(b != 0) ? b : a", which can be
> +     simplified to "b | ((b != 0) ? 0 : a)".  */
> +  if (code == NE && cond_arg1 == const0_rtx &&
> +      REG_P (b) && rtx_equal_p (b, cond_arg0))
> +    {
> +      orig_b = b;
> +      b = const0_rtx;
> +    }
> +
> +  /* We may encounter the form "(b == 0) ? b : a", which can be
> +     simplied to "(b == 0) ? 0 : a".  */
> +  if (code == EQ && cond_arg1 == const0_rtx &&
> +      REG_P (b) && rtx_equal_p (b, cond_arg0))
> +    {
> +      b = const0_rtx;
> +    }
> +
> +  start_sequence ();
> +
> +  if ((a == const0_rtx && (REG_P (b) || rtx_equal_p (b, x)))
> +      || ((reversep = (noce_reversed_cond_code (if_info) != UNKNOWN))
> +         && b == const0_rtx && (REG_P (a) || rtx_equal_p (a, x))))
> +    {
> +      target = noce_emit_condzero(if_info, reversep ? a : b, reversep);
> +
> +      /* Handle the case where we replace b in "(b != 0) ? b : a" with
> +        with const0_rtx to then emit "b | ((b != 0) ? 0 : a)".  */
> +      if (orig_b && target)
> +       target = expand_simple_binop (GET_MODE (x), IOR, orig_b,
> +                                     target, x, 0, OPTAB_WIDEN);
> +
> +      if (target)
> +       {
> +         if (target != if_info->x)
> +           noce_emit_move_insn (if_info->x, target);
> +
> +         seq = end_ifcvt_sequence (if_info);
> +         if (!seq || !targetm.noce_conversion_profitable_p (seq, if_info))
> +           return FALSE;
> +
> +         emit_insn_before_setloc (seq, if_info->jump,
> +                                  INSN_LOCATION (if_info->insn_a));
> +         if_info->transform_name = "noce_try_condzero";
> +
> +         return TRUE;
> +       }
> +    }
> +
> +  end_sequence ();
> +
> +  return FALSE;
> +}
> +
> +/* Convert "if (test) x op= a;" to a branchless sequence using the
> +   canonical form for a conditional-zero. */
> +static int
> +noce_try_condzero_arith (struct noce_if_info *if_info)
> +{
> +  rtx target;
> +  rtx_insn *seq;
> +  rtx_code op = GET_CODE (if_info->a);
> +  const rtx arg0 = XEXP (if_info->a, 0);
> +  const rtx arg1 = XEXP (if_info->a, 1);
> +
> +  if (!noce_simple_bbs (if_info))
> +    return FALSE;
> +
> +  /* Check for no else condition.  */
> +  if (!rtx_equal_p (if_info->x, if_info->b))
> +    return FALSE;
> +
> +  if (op != PLUS && op != MINUS && op != IOR && op != XOR &&
> +      op != ASHIFT && op != ASHIFTRT && op != LSHIFTRT && op != AND)
> +    return FALSE;
> +
> +  if (!rtx_equal_p (if_info->x, arg0))
> +    return FALSE;
> +
> +  start_sequence ();
> +
> +  target = noce_emit_condzero(if_info, arg1, op != AND ? true : false);
> +
> +  if (target)
> +    {
> +      rtx op1 = if_info->x;
> +
> +      if (op == AND)
> +       {
> +         /* Emit "tmp = x & val;" followed by "tmp |= !cond ? x : 0;" */
> +         op1 = expand_simple_binop (GET_MODE (if_info->x), AND, op1,
> +                                    arg1, NULL_RTX, 0, OPTAB_WIDEN);
> +         op = IOR;
> +       }
> +
> +      if (op1)
> +       target = expand_simple_binop (GET_MODE (if_info->x), op, op1,
> +                                     target, if_info->x, 0, OPTAB_WIDEN);
> +    }
> +
> +  if (target)
> +    {
> +      if (target != if_info->x)
> +       noce_emit_move_insn (if_info->x, target);
> +
> +      seq = end_ifcvt_sequence (if_info);
> +      if (!seq || !targetm.noce_conversion_profitable_p (seq, if_info))
> +       return FALSE;
> +
> +      emit_insn_before_setloc(seq, if_info->jump,
> +                             INSN_LOCATION(if_info->insn_a));
> +      if_info->transform_name = "noce_try_condzero_arith";
> +
> +      return TRUE;
> +    }
> +
> +  end_sequence ();
> +
> +  return FALSE;
> +}
> +
>  /* Convert "if (test) x = 0;" to "x &= -(test == 0);"  */
>
>  static int
> @@ -3967,8 +4179,12 @@ noce_process_if_block (struct noce_if_info *if_info)
>      {
>        if (noce_try_addcc (if_info))
>         goto success;
> +      if (noce_try_condzero (if_info))
> +       goto success;
>        if (noce_try_store_flag_mask (if_info))
>         goto success;
> +      if (noce_try_condzero_arith (if_info))
> +       goto success;
>        if (HAVE_conditional_move
>           && noce_try_cmove_arith (if_info))
>         goto success;
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-and-01.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-and-01.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..d9b0ff00756
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-and-01.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_zicond -mabi=lp64 -mbranch-cost=4" } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-Og" "-Os" "-Oz" } } */
> +
> +long and1(long a, long b, long c, long d)
> +{
> +  if (c < d)
> +    a &= b;
> +
> +  return a;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "and\t" 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "slt" 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "czero.nez" 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "or\t" 1 } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-and-02.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-and-02.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..80f417cfb54
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-and-02.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_zicond -mabi=lp64 -mbranch-cost=4" } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-Og" "-Os" "-Oz" } } */
> +
> +int and2(int a, int b, long c)
> +{
> +  if (c)
> +    a &= b;
> +
> +  return a;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "and\t" 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "czero.nez" 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "or\t" 1 } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-eq-01.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-eq-01.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..4f933c1db60
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-eq-01.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_zicond -mabi=lp64" } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-Og" } } */
> +
> +long
> +eq1 (long a, long b)
> +{
> +  return (a == 0) ? b : 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "czero.nez" 1 } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-eq-02.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-eq-02.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..a7bc747ab1d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-eq-02.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_zicond -mabi=lp64" } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-Og" } } */
> +
> +long
> +eq2 (long a, long b)
> +{
> +  if (a == 0)
> +    return b;
> +
> +  return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "czero.nez" 1 } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-lt-01.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-lt-01.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..830bfc6449f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-lt-01.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_zicond -mabi=lp64" } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-Og" "-Os" "-Oz" } } */
> +
> +long long sink (long long);
> +
> +long long lt3 (long long a, long long b)
> +{
> +  if (a < b)
> +    b = 0;
> +
> +  return sink(b);
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "czero.nez\t" 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "slt\t" 1 } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ne-01.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ne-01.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..f25e601ae3c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ne-01.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_zicond -mabi=lp64" } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-Og" } } */
> +
> +long long ne1(long long a, long long b)
> +{
> +  return (a != 0) ? b : 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "czero.eqz" 1 } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-xor-01.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-xor-01.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..c45a3be2680
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-xor-01.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_zicond -mabi=lp64" } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-Og" "-Os" "-Oz" } } */
> +
> +long xor1(long crc, long poly)
> +{
> +  if (crc & 1)
> +    crc ^= poly;
> +
> +  return crc;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "czero.eqz" 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "xor\t" 1 } } */
> --
> 2.34.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-10 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-10 22:41 [RFC PATCH v1 00/10] RISC-V: Support the Zicond (conditional-operations) extension Philipp Tomsich
2023-02-10 22:41 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/10] docs: Document a canonical RTL for a conditional-zero insns Philipp Tomsich
2023-02-10 23:18   ` Andrew Pinski
2023-02-10 22:41 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/10] RISC-V: Recognize Zicond (conditional operations) extension Philipp Tomsich
2023-04-20 17:44   ` Jeff Law
2023-02-10 22:41 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/10] RISC-V: Generate czero.eqz/nez on noce_try_store_flag_mask if-conversion Philipp Tomsich
2023-04-20 17:53   ` Jeff Law
2023-02-10 22:41 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/10] RISC-V: Support immediates in Zicond Philipp Tomsich
2023-04-20 18:00   ` Jeff Law
2023-02-10 22:41 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/10] RISC-V: Support noce_try_store_flag_mask as czero.eqz/czero.nez Philipp Tomsich
2023-04-21 19:31   ` Jeff Law
2023-02-10 22:41 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/10] RISC-V: Recognize sign-extract + and cases for czero.eqz/nez Philipp Tomsich
2023-04-21 19:40   ` Jeff Law
2023-02-10 22:41 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/10] RISC-V: Recognize bexti in negated if-conversion Philipp Tomsich
2023-04-21 19:56   ` Jeff Law
2023-02-10 22:41 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/10] ifcvt: add if-conversion to conditional-zero instructions Philipp Tomsich
2023-02-10 23:07   ` Andrew Pinski [this message]
2023-02-13 17:32     ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-13 18:43       ` Jeff Law
2023-02-13 18:53         ` Andrew Pinski
2023-02-13  7:31   ` Jeff Law
2023-02-28 16:42     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2023-03-11 15:50       ` Jeff Law
2023-02-10 22:41 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/10] RISC-V: Recognize xventanacondops extension Philipp Tomsich
2023-04-21 19:57   ` Jeff Law
2023-04-25  9:53     ` Kito Cheng
2023-04-25 10:15       ` Philipp Tomsich
2023-04-25 10:43         ` Kito Cheng
2023-04-26  2:28       ` Jeff Law
2023-02-10 22:41 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/10] RISC-V: Support XVentanaCondOps extension Philipp Tomsich
2023-04-21 19:58   ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+=Sn1=3Z2hLaVaumXBVD5rAG5kXryPunxZ7x+PMRFmq0_KY2w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=pinskia@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@sifive.com \
    --cc=christoph.muellner@vrull.eu \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
    --cc=vineetg@rivosinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).