From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] gdb: add qMachineId packet
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 23:39:31 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fs4ber6k.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94e68e6c1400ede2e9e46fc8ef76bd82aa533e0e.1692200989.git.aburgess@redhat.com>
Hello Andrew,
This is a very interesting feature, thanks. For now at least, I have
just one comment on the machine-id for Linux:
Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
> Generating a suitable machine-id is, I think, always going to be
> target specific. As such, I've structured the code in a way that
> allows different targets to provide their own implementations, but
> I've only implemented a solution for the Linux targets.
>
> The reply to a qMachineId packet looks like this:
>
> predicate;key=value[;key=value]*
>
> the idea being that the reply consists of a number of key/value pairs,
> each of which must match in order for GDB to consider the machine-id a
> match. I currently propose just two keys:
>
> linux-boot-id - this returns the value from the file
> /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id, which, if I understand correctly,
> should be unique(ish) for each boot of each machine, and
>
> cuserid - this returns the value of the cuserid call.
>
> My thinking is that if we know we are on the same machine (thanks to
> linux-boot-id), and we know we are the same effective user (thanks to
> cuserid) then there's a pretty good chance that GDB and the remote can
> access the same set of files.
Unfortunately the two keys above won't detect when GDB and gdbserver are
running on the same machine but in different containers. I suggest
adding a new key for that:
mountinfo - The hash of the contents of the target's
/proc/self/mountinfo file.
The hash algorithm could be either SHA1 or MD5, which have
implementations in libiberty.
Disclaimer: I'm no expert in Linux containers, so I wouldn't be
surprised if there were a better way to differentiate containers (or,
more specifically for this use case, filesystem namespaces).
--
Thiago
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-22 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-16 15:54 [PATCH 00/10] Improve GDB/gdbserver experience when using a local gdbserver Andrew Burgess
2023-08-16 15:54 ` [PATCH 01/10] gdb: have remote_target::extended_remote_run take the exec filename Andrew Burgess
2023-08-23 9:30 ` Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova
2023-08-16 15:54 ` [PATCH 02/10] gdb: improve how 'remote exec-file' is stored and accessed Andrew Burgess
2023-08-23 8:44 ` Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova
2023-08-16 15:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] gdb: improve show text and help text for 'remote exec-file' Andrew Burgess
2023-08-23 11:36 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-08-24 8:56 ` Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova
2023-08-16 15:55 ` [PATCH 04/10] gdb/gdbserver: add new qDefaultExecAndArgs packet Andrew Burgess
2023-08-16 16:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-08-28 15:35 ` Tom Tromey
2023-08-16 15:55 ` [PATCH 05/10] gdb: detect when gdbserver has no default executable set Andrew Burgess
2023-08-16 15:55 ` [PATCH 06/10] gdb: make use of is_target_filename Andrew Burgess
2023-08-23 13:35 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-08-16 15:55 ` [PATCH 07/10] gdb: add qMachineId packet Andrew Burgess
2023-08-16 16:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-08-25 14:49 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-08-25 15:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-09-26 14:42 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-09-29 7:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-08-22 2:39 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2023-08-23 9:24 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-08-23 11:36 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-08-28 16:06 ` Tom Tromey
2023-08-16 15:55 ` [PATCH 08/10] gdb: remote filesystem can be local to GDB in some cases Andrew Burgess
2023-08-16 16:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-08-16 15:55 ` [PATCH 09/10] gdb: use exec_file with remote targets when possible Andrew Burgess
2023-08-16 15:55 ` [PATCH 10/10] gdb: remote the get_remote_exec_file function Andrew Burgess
2023-08-23 13:42 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-08-22 10:41 ` [PATCH 00/10] Improve GDB/gdbserver experience when using a local gdbserver Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova
2023-08-23 14:32 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-08-23 15:26 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-08-25 15:34 ` [PATCHv2 " Andrew Burgess
2023-08-25 15:34 ` [PATCHv2 01/10] gdb: have remote_target::extended_remote_run take the exec filename Andrew Burgess
2023-08-25 15:34 ` [PATCHv2 02/10] gdb: improve how 'remote exec-file' is stored and accessed Andrew Burgess
2023-08-25 15:34 ` [PATCHv2 03/10] gdb: improve show text and help text for 'remote exec-file' Andrew Burgess
2023-08-25 15:34 ` [PATCHv2 04/10] gdb/gdbserver: add new qDefaultExecAndArgs packet Andrew Burgess
2023-08-26 6:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-08-25 15:34 ` [PATCHv2 05/10] gdb: detect when gdbserver has no default executable set Andrew Burgess
2023-08-25 15:34 ` [PATCHv2 06/10] gdb: make use of is_target_filename Andrew Burgess
2023-08-25 15:34 ` [PATCHv2 07/10] gdb: add qMachineId packet Andrew Burgess
2023-08-26 6:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-08-25 15:34 ` [PATCHv2 08/10] gdb: remote filesystem can be local to GDB in some cases Andrew Burgess
2023-08-26 6:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-08-25 15:34 ` [PATCHv2 09/10] gdb: use exec_file with remote targets when possible Andrew Burgess
2023-08-25 15:34 ` [PATCHv2 10/10] gdb: remove the get_remote_exec_file function Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fs4ber6k.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).