public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zack Weinberg <zack@owlfolio.org>
To: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	 Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>,
	Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	autoconf@gnu.org,  c-std-porting@lists.linux.dev,
	 toolchain@gentoo.org, bug-gnulib@gnu.org
Subject: Re: On time64 and Large File Support
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 09:16:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ypikbkpccl6i.fsf@owlfolio.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26EF336D-C051-49D6-98A9-EF0707591A6D@gentoo.org> (Sam James's message of "Sat, 12 Nov 2022 03:57:28 +0000")

Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> writes:

>> On 12 Nov 2022, at 02:20, Zack Weinberg via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org> wrote:
>> I am honestly not sure what to do about this in the long term, but for
>> the proposed “this weekend, just bugfixes” Autoconf 2.72, I do think it
>> makes sense to back out change #2, only — that is, AC_SYS_YEAR2038 will
>> exist, but AC_SYS_LARGEFILE will *not* imply AC_SYS_YEAR2038.  That will
>> limit the impact of AC_SYS_YEAR2038 to packages that have explicitly
>> added it, and should make it safe for Fedora and Gentoo to drop in 2.72
>> in order to unblock C23 testing — am I correct?  It doesn’t resolve the
>> larger issue, but it gives us more time to think about what the
>> resolution ought to be.
>> 
>> What do you think?
>
> This is really I think the best option while allowing us time & space
> to complete the larger discussion.
[…]

I am going to go ahead and do this if nobody raises a concrete objection
within the next 24 hours.

zw

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-12 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-11  8:38 Sam James
2022-11-11  9:16 ` Paul Eggert
2022-11-11  9:19   ` Sam James
2022-11-11 23:48   ` Joseph Myers
2022-11-11  9:19 ` Florian Weimer
2022-11-11  9:27   ` Sam James
2022-11-11 11:38     ` Florian Weimer
2022-11-11 20:12       ` Paul Eggert
2022-11-12  2:20     ` Zack Weinberg
2022-11-12  3:57       ` Sam James
2022-11-12 14:16         ` Zack Weinberg [this message]
2022-11-12 17:41           ` Paul Eggert
2022-11-12 18:50             ` Bruno Haible
2022-11-12 19:15               ` Paul Eggert
2022-11-12 20:23                 ` Wookey
2022-11-12 20:54                   ` Russ Allbery
2022-11-12 21:31                   ` Paul Eggert
2022-11-15  5:09                     ` Sam James
2022-11-12 18:19       ` Paul Eggert
2022-11-11  9:40   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2022-11-11 11:30     ` Florian Weimer
2022-11-11 19:01       ` Andreas K. Huettel
2022-11-11 19:28         ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-11-11  9:46   ` Paul Eggert
2022-11-11 11:22     ` Florian Weimer
2022-11-11 19:56       ` Paul Eggert
2022-11-12  4:20   ` Wookey
2022-11-12  4:28     ` Sam James
2022-11-12  4:56       ` Wookey
2022-11-12  4:59         ` Sam James
2022-11-12 18:33     ` Paul Eggert
2022-11-14  8:39   ` Adam Sampson
2022-11-14 11:47     ` Florian Weimer
2022-11-14 20:26     ` Arsen Arsenović
2022-11-14 20:52       ` Florian Weimer
2022-11-15  7:39         ` Arsen Arsenović
2022-11-11 10:25 ` Richard Purdie
2023-03-01 22:38 ` Eric Blake
2023-03-02  0:29   ` Demi Marie Obenour
2023-03-02  9:04     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 10:28       ` Paul Eggert
2023-03-02 10:38         ` Andreas Schwab
2023-03-03  5:46           ` Paul Eggert
2023-03-06  8:58             ` Andreas Schwab
2023-03-06 10:19               ` Florian Weimer
2023-03-02 11:02         ` Richard W.M. Jones
2023-03-02 12:17           ` Bruno Haible
2023-03-02 13:24             ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03  3:30               ` Wookey
2023-03-03  5:50                 ` Paul Eggert
2023-03-03 14:01                   ` Wookey
2023-03-03 14:14                     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 23:21             ` Arsen Arsenović
2023-03-03 11:49           ` Florian Weimer
2023-03-03 12:39             ` Richard W.M. Jones
2023-03-02  8:30   ` Richard W.M. Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ypikbkpccl6i.fsf@owlfolio.org \
    --to=zack@owlfolio.org \
    --cc=autoconf@gnu.org \
    --cc=bug-gnulib@gnu.org \
    --cc=c-std-porting@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=sam@gentoo.org \
    --cc=toolchain@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).