From: Nelson Chu <nelson@rivosinc.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich via Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Andrew Waterman <andrew@sifive.com>,
Jim Wilson <jim.wilson.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] RISC-V: relax post-relocation-operator separator expectation
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:44:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPpQWtDA5W94up0s6==8=nxtKE8-i_1=ChyNzeee0mGys-NoJg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87354otl13.fsf@igel.home>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 947 bytes --]
Thanks for the information, Andreas. The riscv-asm should be the right
place to see the expected behaviors, and discuss the related stuff :-)
Nelson
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 4:37 PM Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
wrote:
> On Mär 10 2023, Jan Beulich via Binutils wrote:
>
> > With a blank being okay as a separator, constructs like
> >
> > lui t0, %hi sym
> > lui t0, %hi 0x1000
> >
> > are accepted. But then it makes little sense to not also accept e.g.
> >
> > lui t0, %hi +sym
> > lui t0, %hi -0x1000
>
> https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-asm-manual/blob/master/riscv-asm.md
> always includes the parens around the expression, and I don't think it
> should be accepted without them.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
> GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
> "And now for something completely different."
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-25 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-10 9:23 [PATCH v2 0/7] RISC-V/gas: insn operand parsing Jan Beulich
2023-03-10 9:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] RISC-V: minor effort reduction in relocation specifier parsing Jan Beulich
2023-03-10 11:24 ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-10 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] RISC-V: drop "percent_op" parameter from my_getOpcodeExpression() Jan Beulich
2023-03-10 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] RISC-V: avoid redundant and misleading/wrong error messages Jan Beulich
2023-03-10 9:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] RISC-V: don't recognize bogus relocations Jan Beulich
2023-03-10 9:27 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] RISC-V: relax post-relocation-operator separator expectation Jan Beulich
2023-04-25 8:13 ` Nelson Chu
2023-04-25 8:37 ` Andreas Schwab
2023-04-25 8:44 ` Nelson Chu [this message]
2023-04-25 8:52 ` Jan Beulich
2023-04-28 1:29 ` Nelson Chu
2023-04-28 6:05 ` Jan Beulich
2023-04-28 8:03 ` Fangrui Song
2023-05-11 11:27 ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-10 9:27 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] RISC-V: test for expected / no unexpected symbols Jan Beulich
2023-03-10 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] RISC-V: adjust logic to avoid register name symbols Jan Beulich
2023-04-25 8:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] RISC-V/gas: insn operand parsing Nelson Chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPpQWtDA5W94up0s6==8=nxtKE8-i_1=ChyNzeee0mGys-NoJg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=nelson@rivosinc.com \
--cc=andrew@sifive.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jim.wilson.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).