public inbox for docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Mason <dcm@redhat.com>
To: Eric Bischoff <ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr>
Cc: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200002231552.KAA13667@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <951281049.19725.ezmlm@sourceware.cygnus.com>

< 200002231510.KAA30278@devserv.devel.redhat.com >
< 38B3FF81.40E6F034@cybercable.tm.fr >
X-URL: < http://www.redhat.com >
From: "David C. Mason" <dcm@redhat.com>
Date: 23 Feb 2000 10:52:21 -0500
Message-ID: <y9xwvnvzzka.fsf@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Lines: 25
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5

Eric Bischoff <ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr> writes:


> Stop, stop, stop, I don't want to start no flame war.

Not my intention - why does everyone think I am angry at them this
week? Jeez.

When you say the scripts are unmaintained I think you are wrong. Mark
is the maintainer of DocBook Tools - DocBook Tools include those
scripts. Instead of announcing you are going to maintain those
scripts, why not ask Marks if you can send some patches to him or get
cvs access to make some changes. You can see by the number of people
already asking you for tarballs that this can cause a split in the
project. I'd like to see more concentration on this project AND some
new projects that do things differently. I would not like to see a
project splinter and confuse. That is just my opinion.

Again, I am not flaming you, I am not upset at you, in fact,
throughout our conversations over the year - I like you.. I too want
to see changes made to the scripts - hell I hack them up on my own
machine and ignore the ones that ship anyway.


Dave

  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-12-27  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <951281049.19725.ezmlm@sourceware.cygnus.com>
2000-12-27  6:36 ` Horacio MG
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Re : " Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36     ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36       ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36     ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27  6:36       ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36         ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36             ` New list (was Re: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?) Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36               ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27  6:36               ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27  6:36               ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? David Mason
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27  6:36 ` David Mason
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36     ` Mark Galassi
2000-12-27  6:36 ` was something else - now SGML and XML David Mason
2000-12-27  6:36 ` David Mason
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27  6:36 ` David Mason [this message]
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Eric Bischoff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200002231552.KAA13667@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=dcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    --cc=ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).