From: Mark Galassi <rosalia@lanl.gov>
To: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87og8o4zmb.fsf@portacipria.lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38B3FF81.40E6F034@cybercable.tm.fr>
>> If you name this one "DocBook Tools it will be the third
>> maintained DocBook Tools. Whatever you might think, Mark is
>> still maintaining DBTools unless he states otherwise. Another
>> fellow has written a
Eric> Stop, stop, stop, I don't want to start no flame war.
Eric> Mark is maintaining the DocBook tools, this is established
Eric> and I don't want to change that. I was just proposing some
Eric> enhancements.
Wow, more deference which I have not been deserving in the last 90
days...
Eric> I am only proposing myself as the maintainer for the db2*
Eric> scripts which have officially "unmaintained" status.
That was a disclaimer that *Cygnus* was not maintaining those tools;
sorry about the confusion.
I'm getting closer to catching up on the list, and it looks like we
are hitting critical mass for the next generation effort, even before
I stepped in.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-27 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <951281049.19725.ezmlm@sourceware.cygnus.com>
2000-12-27 6:36 ` was something else - now SGML and XML David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Horacio MG
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : " Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` New list (was Re: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?) Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27 6:36 ` David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Mark Galassi [this message]
2000-12-27 6:36 ` was something else - now SGML and XML David Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87og8o4zmb.fsf@portacipria.lanl.gov \
--to=rosalia@lanl.gov \
--cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).