From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
To: David Mason <dcm@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Bischoff <ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr>,
docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6289-Wed23Feb2000102546-0500-ndw@nwalsh.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200002231510.KAA30278@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
/ David Mason <dcm@redhat.com> was heard to say:
| Don't misunderstand me either - I say the more tools we have *the
| better*! In fact, I'd like to see more tools for XML (that aren't
| java) for the simple reason that once DocBook hits 5.0 it will only be
| XML.
While true, I think that's a somewhat misleading statement.
DocBook 5.0 will be an XML DTD, but XML *is* SGML, so
it will be an SGML DTD as well. :-)
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Reality is what refuses to go away
http://nwalsh.com/ | when I stop believing in
| it.--Philip K. Dick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-27 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <951281049.19725.ezmlm@sourceware.cygnus.com>
2000-12-27 6:36 ` was something else - now SGML and XML David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Horacio MG
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : " Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` New list (was Re: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?) Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` was something else - now SGML and XML David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh [this message]
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Mark Galassi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6289-Wed23Feb2000102546-0500-ndw@nwalsh.com \
--to=ndw@nwalsh.com \
--cc=dcm@redhat.com \
--cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
--cc=ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).