From: David Mason <dcm@redhat.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: was something else - now SGML and XML
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200002231643.LAA22211@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <951281049.19725.ezmlm@sourceware.cygnus.com>
< 200002231540.KAA08528@devserv.devel.redhat.com >
< 7453-Wed23Feb2000110215-0500-ndw@nwalsh.com >
X-URL: < http://www.redhat.com >
From: "David C. Mason" <dcm@redhat.com>
Date: 23 Feb 2000 11:43:04 -0500
Message-ID: <y9xk8jv3m5j.fsf@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes:
> If you're referring to IE5 support for XSL, it's so badly broken
> that it's just about useless. (Worse than useless, in fact.)
Is that true - I, obviously, don't use IE but I see a lot of traffic on
the DocBook lists from people who do and despite the fact that they
are usually trying to work around some problem - there sure seems to
be a lot of people using it. Is that true or am I trapped in a good
marketing scheme?
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-27 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <951281049.19725.ezmlm@sourceware.cygnus.com>
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` David Mason [this message]
2000-12-27 6:36 ` was something else - now SGML and XML Norman Walsh
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Mark Galassi
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27 6:36 ` was something else - now SGML and XML David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Horacio MG
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : " Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` New list (was Re: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?) Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : " David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200002231643.LAA22211@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=dcm@redhat.com \
--cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
--cc=ndw@nwalsh.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).