From: Eric Bischoff <ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr>
To: docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38B41292.7093C328@cybercable.tm.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200002231552.KAA13667@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
David Mason wrote:
> When you say the scripts are unmaintained I think you are wrong. Mark
> is the maintainer of DocBook Tools - DocBook Tools include those
> scripts.
Well, it's what I have been reading in all docbook tool packages. And
when I have been proposing a patch to db2ps to make it work with
alternate stylesheets, I never had any answer, but maybe Mark was too
busy to integrate this patch.
> Instead of announcing you are going to maintain those
> scripts, why not ask Marks if you can send some patches to him or get
> cvs access to make some changes. You can see by the number of people
Done. I've been asking this directly to Mark a few weeks ago. Again, no
answer. Mark may be on holliday, though. I did not want to make my
projects public, because I wanted to hear Mark's opinion before, but
people were wondering what existed as docbook tools, and some were
starting to say that they did not use them.
I don't think that CVS concurrent access for me would be a good idea,
because the changes are too radical to be done without approval from
Mark.
> already asking you for tarballs that this can cause a split in the
> project. I'd like to see more concentration on this project AND some
> new projects that do things differently. I would not like to see a
> project splinter and confuse. That is just my opinion.
You're perfectly right.
> Again, I am not flaming you, I am not upset at you, in fact,
> throughout our conversations over the year - I like you.. I too want
I love you too. Kiss me ;-)
> to see changes made to the scripts - hell I hack them up on my own
> machine and ignore the ones that ship anyway.
I just tried to do something simple, clean and robust that would need
less hacking.
--
Eric Bischoff - Documentation and Localization
Caldera (Deutschland) GmbH - Linux for Business!
Tel: +49 9131 7192 300 - Fax: +49 9131 7192 399
http://www.caldera.de/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-27 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <951281049.19725.ezmlm@sourceware.cygnus.com>
2000-12-27 6:36 ` was something else - now SGML and XML David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Mark Galassi
2000-12-27 6:36 ` David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Horacio MG
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : " Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` New list (was Re: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?) Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff [this message]
2000-12-27 6:36 ` was something else - now SGML and XML David Mason
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38B41292.7093C328@cybercable.tm.fr \
--to=ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr \
--cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).