public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug tdep/29247] [gdb, tdep] ../../gdb/ppc-sysv-tdep.c:1945: internal-error: ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value: Assertion `ok' failed
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 13:09:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-29247-4717-9wgPBo58px@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-29247-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29247
Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |13.1
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #28 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #27)
> This doesn't seem to be related to the return value passing bit, so I
> propose to close this PR and file a new one (assuming this is an unknown
> issue).
Filed PR29543 - "[gdb/tdep] inferior call with complex long double vararg not
handled correctly".
Marking resolved-fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-02 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-14 8:58 [Bug tdep/29247] New: " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-14 14:51 ` [Bug tdep/29247] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-15 11:59 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-15 13:27 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-15 14:47 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-15 14:51 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-15 15:49 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-15 15:59 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-15 22:47 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-16 13:53 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-20 12:25 ` ulrich.weigand at de dot ibm.com
2022-06-21 16:32 ` cel at us dot ibm.com
2022-06-23 15:19 ` cel at us dot ibm.com
2022-06-23 15:22 ` cel at us dot ibm.com
2022-06-23 15:30 ` ulrich.weigand at de dot ibm.com
2022-06-23 19:56 ` cel at us dot ibm.com
2022-06-24 0:53 ` cel at us dot ibm.com
2022-06-24 11:53 ` ulrich.weigand at de dot ibm.com
2022-06-25 0:42 ` cel at us dot ibm.com
2022-06-25 2:51 ` ulrich.weigand at de dot ibm.com
2022-06-30 22:47 ` cel at us dot ibm.com
2022-07-12 9:15 ` ulrich.weigand at de dot ibm.com
2022-07-13 17:46 ` cel at us dot ibm.com
2022-07-15 15:32 ` cel at us dot ibm.com
2022-07-15 16:09 ` cel at us dot ibm.com
2022-07-27 8:45 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-27 15:38 ` cel at us dot ibm.com
2022-07-27 15:42 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-27 16:54 ` cel at us dot ibm.com
2022-09-02 12:55 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-02 13:09 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-29247-4717-9wgPBo58px@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).