public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug tdep/29247] [gdb, tdep] ../../gdb/ppc-sysv-tdep.c:1945: internal-error: ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value: Assertion `ok' failed Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 15:59:26 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-29247-4717-U1qNAE0gif@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-29247-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29247 --- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I tried the min.c example as well without the _Complex, so using long double. But stepping through ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value, I found that the default RETURN_VALUE_STRUCT_CONVENTION is returned, which does not look correct, given that AFAIU the disassembly, registers are used. I went to check what the output was with gdb.base/callfuncs.exp, and found that while complex long double is tested, long double is not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-15 15:59 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-06-14 8:58 [Bug tdep/29247] New: " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-14 14:51 ` [Bug tdep/29247] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-15 11:59 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-15 13:27 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-15 14:47 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-15 14:51 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-15 15:49 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-15 15:59 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2022-06-15 22:47 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-16 13:53 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-20 12:25 ` ulrich.weigand at de dot ibm.com 2022-06-21 16:32 ` cel at us dot ibm.com 2022-06-23 15:19 ` cel at us dot ibm.com 2022-06-23 15:22 ` cel at us dot ibm.com 2022-06-23 15:30 ` ulrich.weigand at de dot ibm.com 2022-06-23 19:56 ` cel at us dot ibm.com 2022-06-24 0:53 ` cel at us dot ibm.com 2022-06-24 11:53 ` ulrich.weigand at de dot ibm.com 2022-06-25 0:42 ` cel at us dot ibm.com 2022-06-25 2:51 ` ulrich.weigand at de dot ibm.com 2022-06-30 22:47 ` cel at us dot ibm.com 2022-07-12 9:15 ` ulrich.weigand at de dot ibm.com 2022-07-13 17:46 ` cel at us dot ibm.com 2022-07-15 15:32 ` cel at us dot ibm.com 2022-07-15 16:09 ` cel at us dot ibm.com 2022-07-27 8:45 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-27 15:38 ` cel at us dot ibm.com 2022-07-27 15:42 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-27 16:54 ` cel at us dot ibm.com 2022-09-02 12:55 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-02 13:09 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-29247-4717-U1qNAE0gif@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).