* [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix ABI related macros in elf.h to keep consistent with binutils[1].
@ 2022-10-31 3:43 caiyinyu
2022-10-31 6:34 ` Xi Ruoyao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: caiyinyu @ 2022-10-31 3:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: adhemerval.zanella; +Cc: libc-alpha, i.swmail, xry111, caiyinyu
[1]:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=c4a7e6b56218e1d5a858682186b542e2eae01a4a;hp=0d94a8735055432029237612a6eb9165db1ec9dd
[2]:
Reference: https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-ELF-ABI-EN.html#_e_flags_identifies_abi_type_and_version
---
elf/elf.h | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/elf/elf.h b/elf/elf.h
index 3f08823a30..383eb5fbff 100644
--- a/elf/elf.h
+++ b/elf/elf.h
@@ -4093,8 +4093,10 @@ enum
#define R_NDS32_TLS_DESC 119
/* LoongArch ELF Flags */
-#define EF_LARCH_ABI 0x07
-#define EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D 0x03
+#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SOFT_FLOAT 0x1
+#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SINGLE_FLOAT 0x2
+#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_DOUBLE_FLOAT 0x3
+#define EF_LOONGARCH_OBJABI_V1 0x40
/* LoongArch specific dynamic relocations */
#define R_LARCH_NONE 0
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix ABI related macros in elf.h to keep consistent with binutils[1].
2022-10-31 3:43 [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix ABI related macros in elf.h to keep consistent with binutils[1] caiyinyu
@ 2022-10-31 6:34 ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-10-31 13:12 ` Carlos O'Donell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xi Ruoyao @ 2022-10-31 6:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caiyinyu, adhemerval.zanella; +Cc: libc-alpha, i.swmail
On Mon, 2022-10-31 at 11:43 +0800, caiyinyu wrote:
> [1]:
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=c4a7e6b56218e1d5a858682186b542e2eae01a4a;hp=0d94a8735055432029237612a6eb9165db1ec9dd
> [2]:
> Reference: https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-ELF-ABI-EN.html#_e_flags_identifies_abi_type_and_version
> ---
> elf/elf.h | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/elf/elf.h b/elf/elf.h
> index 3f08823a30..383eb5fbff 100644
> --- a/elf/elf.h
> +++ b/elf/elf.h
> @@ -4093,8 +4093,10 @@ enum
> #define R_NDS32_TLS_DESC 119
>
> /* LoongArch ELF Flags */
> -#define EF_LARCH_ABI 0x07
> -#define EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D 0x03
Does Glibc API policy allow to remove a macro definition in a public
header?
> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SOFT_FLOAT 0x1
> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SINGLE_FLOAT 0x2
> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_DOUBLE_FLOAT 0x3
> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_OBJABI_V1 0x40
>
> /* LoongArch specific dynamic relocations */
> #define R_LARCH_NONE 0
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix ABI related macros in elf.h to keep consistent with binutils[1].
2022-10-31 6:34 ` Xi Ruoyao
@ 2022-10-31 13:12 ` Carlos O'Donell
2022-11-01 2:00 ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-11-01 2:02 ` caiyinyu
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Carlos O'Donell @ 2022-10-31 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xi Ruoyao, caiyinyu, adhemerval.zanella; +Cc: i.swmail, libc-alpha
On 10/31/22 02:34, Xi Ruoyao via Libc-alpha wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-10-31 at 11:43 +0800, caiyinyu wrote:
>> [1]:
>> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=c4a7e6b56218e1d5a858682186b542e2eae01a4a;hp=0d94a8735055432029237612a6eb9165db1ec9dd
>> [2]:
>> Reference: https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-ELF-ABI-EN.html#_e_flags_identifies_abi_type_and_version
>> ---
>> elf/elf.h | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/elf/elf.h b/elf/elf.h
>> index 3f08823a30..383eb5fbff 100644
>> --- a/elf/elf.h
>> +++ b/elf/elf.h
>> @@ -4093,8 +4093,10 @@ enum
>> #define R_NDS32_TLS_DESC 119
>>
>> /* LoongArch ELF Flags */
>> -#define EF_LARCH_ABI 0x07
I assume this is a mask for the bits.
>> -#define EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D 0x03
>
> Does Glibc API policy allow to remove a macro definition in a public
> header?
If a public glibc release has been made of this header then it is public ABI.
How big is the LoongArch community? You could remove these things if you wanted,
but it is not good for existing source compatibility.
>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SOFT_FLOAT 0x1
>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SINGLE_FLOAT 0x2
>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_DOUBLE_FLOAT 0x3
Best practice is to keep the old macro names around.
Add the new macro names.
The same value should have the *same* semantics, otherwise it's an ABI break.
>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_OBJABI_V1 0x40
>>
>> /* LoongArch specific dynamic relocations */
>> #define R_LARCH_NONE 0
>
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix ABI related macros in elf.h to keep consistent with binutils[1].
2022-10-31 13:12 ` Carlos O'Donell
@ 2022-11-01 2:00 ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-11-01 2:02 ` caiyinyu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xi Ruoyao @ 2022-11-01 2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos O'Donell, caiyinyu, adhemerval.zanella; +Cc: i.swmail, libc-alpha
On Mon, 2022-10-31 at 09:12 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 10/31/22 02:34, Xi Ruoyao via Libc-alpha wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-10-31 at 11:43 +0800, caiyinyu wrote:
> > > [1]:
> > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=c4a7e6b56218e1d5a858682186b542e2eae01a4a;hp=0d94a8735055432029237612a6eb9165db1ec9dd
> > > [2]:
> > > Reference: https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-ELF-ABI-EN.html#_e_flags_identifies_abi_type_and_version
> > > ---
> > > elf/elf.h | 6 ++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/elf/elf.h b/elf/elf.h
> > > index 3f08823a30..383eb5fbff 100644
> > > --- a/elf/elf.h
> > > +++ b/elf/elf.h
> > > @@ -4093,8 +4093,10 @@ enum
> > > #define R_NDS32_TLS_DESC 119
> > >
> > > /* LoongArch ELF Flags */
> > > -#define EF_LARCH_ABI 0x07
>
> I assume this is a mask for the bits.
>
> > > -#define EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D 0x03
> >
> > Does Glibc API policy allow to remove a macro definition in a public
> > header?
>
> If a public glibc release has been made of this header then it is public ABI.
>
> How big is the LoongArch community? You could remove these things if you wanted,
> but it is not good for existing source compatibility.
>
> > > +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SOFT_FLOAT 0x1
> > > +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SINGLE_FLOAT 0x2
> > > +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_DOUBLE_FLOAT 0x3
Hmm, is "LARCH" -> "LOONGARCH" change intentional here?
> Best practice is to keep the old macro names around.
>
> Add the new macro names.
I agree.
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix ABI related macros in elf.h to keep consistent with binutils[1].
2022-10-31 13:12 ` Carlos O'Donell
2022-11-01 2:00 ` Xi Ruoyao
@ 2022-11-01 2:02 ` caiyinyu
2022-11-01 2:14 ` Xi Ruoyao
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: caiyinyu @ 2022-11-01 2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos O'Donell, Xi Ruoyao, adhemerval.zanella; +Cc: i.swmail, libc-alpha
在 2022/10/31 下午9:12, Carlos O'Donell 写道:
> On 10/31/22 02:34, Xi Ruoyao via Libc-alpha wrote:
>> On Mon, 2022-10-31 at 11:43 +0800, caiyinyu wrote:
>>> [1]:
>>> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=c4a7e6b56218e1d5a858682186b542e2eae01a4a;hp=0d94a8735055432029237612a6eb9165db1ec9dd
>>> [2]:
>>> Reference: https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-ELF-ABI-EN.html#_e_flags_identifies_abi_type_and_version
>>> ---
>>> elf/elf.h | 6 ++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/elf/elf.h b/elf/elf.h
>>> index 3f08823a30..383eb5fbff 100644
>>> --- a/elf/elf.h
>>> +++ b/elf/elf.h
>>> @@ -4093,8 +4093,10 @@ enum
>>> #define R_NDS32_TLS_DESC 119
>>>
>>> /* LoongArch ELF Flags */
>>> -#define EF_LARCH_ABI 0x07
> I assume this is a mask for the bits.
>
>>> -#define EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D 0x03
>> Does Glibc API policy allow to remove a macro definition in a public
>> header?
> If a public glibc release has been made of this header then it is public ABI.
>
> How big is the LoongArch community? You could remove these things if you wanted,
> but it is not good for existing source compatibility.
>
>>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SOFT_FLOAT 0x1
>>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SINGLE_FLOAT 0x2
>>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_DOUBLE_FLOAT 0x3
> Best practice is to keep the old macro names around.
>
> Add the new macro names.
>
> The same value should have the *same* semantics, otherwise it's an ABI break.
Fixed.
diff --git a/elf/elf.h b/elf/elf.h
index 3f08823a30..d51eb75a73 100644
--- a/elf/elf.h
+++ b/elf/elf.h
@@ -4093,8 +4093,11 @@ enum
#define R_NDS32_TLS_DESC 119
/* LoongArch ELF Flags */
-#define EF_LARCH_ABI 0x07
-#define EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D 0x03
+#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_MODIFIER_MASK 0x07
+#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SOFT_FLOAT 0x01
+#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SINGLE_FLOAT 0x02
+#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_DOUBLE_FLOAT 0x03
+#define EF_LOONGARCH_OBJABI_V1 0x40
/* LoongArch specific dynamic relocations */
#define R_LARCH_NONE 0
>>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_OBJABI_V1 0x40
>>>
>>> /* LoongArch specific dynamic relocations */
>>> #define R_LARCH_NONE 0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix ABI related macros in elf.h to keep consistent with binutils[1].
2022-11-01 2:02 ` caiyinyu
@ 2022-11-01 2:14 ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-11-02 6:13 ` caiyinyu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xi Ruoyao @ 2022-11-01 2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caiyinyu, Carlos O'Donell, adhemerval.zanella; +Cc: i.swmail, libc-alpha
On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 10:02 +0800, caiyinyu wrote:
> diff --git a/elf/elf.h b/elf/elf.h
>
> index 3f08823a30..d51eb75a73 100644
> --- a/elf/elf.h
> +++ b/elf/elf.h
> @@ -4093,8 +4093,11 @@ enum
> #define R_NDS32_TLS_DESC 119
>
> /* LoongArch ELF Flags */
> -#define EF_LARCH_ABI 0x07
> -#define EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D 0x03
> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_MODIFIER_MASK 0x07
> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SOFT_FLOAT 0x01
> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SINGLE_FLOAT 0x02
> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_DOUBLE_FLOAT 0x03
> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_OBJABI_V1 0x40
Again, is "LARCH" -> "LOONGARCH" change intentional? The ABI doc does
not specified the name of these macros... And we already have R_LARCH_*
so the difference of "LARCH" and "LOONGARCH" seems puzzling.
And is it an option to keep old names there with a warning?
#define EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D __glibc_macro_warning ("EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D is deprecated") 0x03
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix ABI related macros in elf.h to keep consistent with binutils[1].
2022-11-01 2:14 ` Xi Ruoyao
@ 2022-11-02 6:13 ` caiyinyu
2022-11-02 6:19 ` WANG Xuerui
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: caiyinyu @ 2022-11-02 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xi Ruoyao, Carlos O'Donell, adhemerval.zanella; +Cc: i.swmail, libc-alpha
在 2022/11/1 上午10:14, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
> On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 10:02 +0800, caiyinyu wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/elf/elf.h b/elf/elf.h
>>
>> index 3f08823a30..d51eb75a73 100644
>> --- a/elf/elf.h
>> +++ b/elf/elf.h
>> @@ -4093,8 +4093,11 @@ enum
>> #define R_NDS32_TLS_DESC 119
>>
>> /* LoongArch ELF Flags */
>> -#define EF_LARCH_ABI 0x07
>> -#define EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D 0x03
>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_MODIFIER_MASK 0x07
>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SOFT_FLOAT 0x01
>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SINGLE_FLOAT 0x02
>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_DOUBLE_FLOAT 0x03
>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_OBJABI_V1 0x40
> Again, is "LARCH" -> "LOONGARCH" change intentional? The ABI doc does
> not specified the name of these macros... And we already have R_LARCH_*
> so the difference of "LARCH" and "LOONGARCH" seems puzzling.
We will use *LARCH* to keep consistent in glibc and binutils like other
arches
and update the docs soon:
diff --git a/elf/elf.h b/elf/elf.h
index d51eb75a73..04dc2ee563 100644
--- a/elf/elf.h
+++ b/elf/elf.h
@@ -4093,11 +4093,11 @@ enum
#define R_NDS32_TLS_DESC 119
/* LoongArch ELF Flags */
-#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_MODIFIER_MASK 0x07
-#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SOFT_FLOAT 0x01
-#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SINGLE_FLOAT 0x02
-#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_DOUBLE_FLOAT 0x03
-#define EF_LOONGARCH_OBJABI_V1 0x40
+#define EF_LARCH_ABI_MODIFIER_MASK 0x07
+#define EF_LARCH_ABI_SOFT_FLOAT 0x01
+#define EF_LARCH_ABI_SINGLE_FLOAT 0x02
+#define EF_LARCH_ABI_DOUBLE_FLOAT 0x03
+#define EF_LARCH_OBJABI_V1 0x40
/* LoongArch specific dynamic relocations */
#define R_LARCH_NONE 0
> And is it an option to keep old names there with a warning?
>
> #define EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D __glibc_macro_warning ("EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D is deprecated") 0x03
>
I tend to remove it now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix ABI related macros in elf.h to keep consistent with binutils[1].
2022-11-02 6:13 ` caiyinyu
@ 2022-11-02 6:19 ` WANG Xuerui
2022-11-02 10:41 ` Xi Ruoyao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: WANG Xuerui @ 2022-11-02 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caiyinyu, Xi Ruoyao, Carlos O'Donell, adhemerval.zanella
Cc: i.swmail, libc-alpha
On 2022/11/2 14:13, caiyinyu wrote:
>
> 在 2022/11/1 上午10:14, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
>> On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 10:02 +0800, caiyinyu wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/elf/elf.h b/elf/elf.h
>>>
>>> index 3f08823a30..d51eb75a73 100644
>>> --- a/elf/elf.h
>>> +++ b/elf/elf.h
>>> @@ -4093,8 +4093,11 @@ enum
>>> #define R_NDS32_TLS_DESC 119
>>>
>>> /* LoongArch ELF Flags */
>>> -#define EF_LARCH_ABI 0x07
>>> -#define EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D 0x03
>>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_MODIFIER_MASK 0x07
>>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SOFT_FLOAT 0x01
>>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SINGLE_FLOAT 0x02
>>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_DOUBLE_FLOAT 0x03
>>> +#define EF_LOONGARCH_OBJABI_V1 0x40
>> Again, is "LARCH" -> "LOONGARCH" change intentional? The ABI doc does
>> not specified the name of these macros... And we already have R_LARCH_*
>> so the difference of "LARCH" and "LOONGARCH" seems puzzling.
>
> We will use *LARCH* to keep consistent in glibc and binutils like
> other arches
Unfortunately it's EF_LOONGARCH_xxx in binutils from day one [1]... BTW
the inconsistency is also present from day one.
[1]:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=include/elf/loongarch.h;h=a6341b46791d3f820f6e120cdc82ca30020ca7ab;hb=HEAD
>
>> And is it an option to keep old names there with a warning?
>>
>> #define EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D __glibc_macro_warning ("EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D
>> is deprecated") 0x03
>>
> I tend to remove it now.
>
While there's very few LoongArch users running fully open-source systems
(most of them instead running the so-called old world distros which are
all more or less commercial distros), deprecating for one release might
be better, although just removing wouldn't cause much harm either. The
current user base of "new world" LoongArch distros are mostly devs or
power users so they know what to expect.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix ABI related macros in elf.h to keep consistent with binutils[1].
2022-11-02 6:19 ` WANG Xuerui
@ 2022-11-02 10:41 ` Xi Ruoyao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xi Ruoyao @ 2022-11-02 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: WANG Xuerui, caiyinyu, Carlos O'Donell, adhemerval.zanella; +Cc: libc-alpha
On Wed, 2022-11-02 at 14:19 +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote:
>
> On 2022/11/2 14:13, caiyinyu wrote:
> >
> > 在 2022/11/1 上午10:14, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
> > > On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 10:02 +0800, caiyinyu wrote:
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/elf/elf.h b/elf/elf.h
> > > >
> > > > index 3f08823a30..d51eb75a73 100644
> > > > --- a/elf/elf.h
> > > > +++ b/elf/elf.h
> > > > @@ -4093,8 +4093,11 @@ enum
> > > > #define R_NDS32_TLS_DESC 119
> > > >
> > > > /* LoongArch ELF Flags */
> > > > -#define EF_LARCH_ABI 0x07
> > > > -#define EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D 0x03
> > > > +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_MODIFIER_MASK 0x07
> > > > +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SOFT_FLOAT 0x01
> > > > +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_SINGLE_FLOAT 0x02
> > > > +#define EF_LOONGARCH_ABI_DOUBLE_FLOAT 0x03
> > > > +#define EF_LOONGARCH_OBJABI_V1 0x40
> > > Again, is "LARCH" -> "LOONGARCH" change intentional? The ABI doc does
> > > not specified the name of these macros... And we already have R_LARCH_*
> > > so the difference of "LARCH" and "LOONGARCH" seems puzzling.
> >
> > We will use *LARCH* to keep consistent in glibc and binutils like
> > other arches
>
> Unfortunately it's EF_LOONGARCH_xxx in binutils from day one [1]... BTW
> the inconsistency is also present from day one.
>
> [1]:
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=include/elf/loongarch.h;h=a6341b46791d3f820f6e120cdc82ca30020ca7ab;hb=HEAD
Fortunately EF_LOONGARCH_xxx in binutils are not a part of the public
API of libbfd (i. e. include/elf/loongarch.h is not installed). So I
think we should use EF_LARCH_* instead of EF_LOONGARCH_* in every public
interface. And we can "fix" binutils later.
> > > And is it an option to keep old names there with a warning?
> > >
> > > #define EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D __glibc_macro_warning ("EF_LARCH_ABI_LP64D
> > > is deprecated") 0x03
> > >
> > I tend to remove it now.
> >
> While there's very few LoongArch users running fully open-source systems
> (most of them instead running the so-called old world distros which are
> all more or less commercial distros), deprecating for one release might
> be better, although just removing wouldn't cause much harm either. The
> current user base of "new world" LoongArch distros are mostly devs or
> power users so they know what to expect.
I don't have a strong opinion. If you insist to remove it now I won't
object.
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-02 10:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-10-31 3:43 [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix ABI related macros in elf.h to keep consistent with binutils[1] caiyinyu
2022-10-31 6:34 ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-10-31 13:12 ` Carlos O'Donell
2022-11-01 2:00 ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-11-01 2:02 ` caiyinyu
2022-11-01 2:14 ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-11-02 6:13 ` caiyinyu
2022-11-02 6:19 ` WANG Xuerui
2022-11-02 10:41 ` Xi Ruoyao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).