From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas.schwinge@siemens.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com>, Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, kito.cheng@gmail.com,
patrick@rivosinc.com, jlaw@ventanamicro.com,
"Maciej W . Rozycki" <macro@embecosm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add missing torture-init and torture-finish for rvv.exp
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 22:34:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzwxsc3b.fsf@dem-tschwing-1.ger.mentorg.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7e7dcfa-6ef7-959b-05d8-fb742f281554@rivosinc.com>
Hi!
On 2023-05-24T11:18:35-0700, Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com> wrote:
> On 5/22/23 20:52, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On 5/22/23 02:17, Kito Cheng wrote:
>>> Ooops, seems still some issue around here,
>>
>> Yep still 5000 fails :-(
>>
>>> but I found something might
>>> related this issue:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/d6654a4be3ba44c0d57be7c8a51d76d9721345e1
>>>
>>> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/23c49bb8d09bc3bfce9a08be637cf32ac014de56
>>>
>>
>> It seems both of these patches are essentially doing what yours did.
>> So something else is amiss still.
Yeah, at this point I'm not sure whether my recent changes really are
related/relevant here.
> Apparently in addition to Kito's patch below, If I comment out the
> additional torture options, failures go down drastically.
Meaning that *all* those ERRORs disappear?
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/riscv.exp
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/riscv.exp
>
> -lappend ADDITIONAL_TORTURE_OPTIONS {-Og -g} {-Oz}
> +#lappend ADDITIONAL_TORTURE_OPTIONS {-Og -g} {-Oz}
>
> @Thomas, do you have some thoughts on how to fix riscv.exp properly in
> light of recent changes to exp files.
I'm trying to understand this, but so far don't. Can I please see a
complete 'gcc.log' file where the ERRORs are visible?
Grüße
Thomas
>>> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 2:42 PM Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Vineet:
>>>>
>>>> Could you help to test this patch, this could resolve that issue on our
>>>> machine, but I would like to also work for other env.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks :)
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> We got bunch of following error message for multi-lib run:
>>>>
>>>> ERROR: torture-init: torture_without_loops is not empty as expected
>>>> ERROR: tcl error code NONE
>>>>
>>>> And seems we need torture-init and torture-finish around the test
>>>> loop.
>>>>
>>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>>
>>>> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/rvv.exp: Add torture-init and
>>>> torture-finish.
>>>> ---
>>>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/rvv.exp | 3 +++
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/rvv.exp
>>>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/rvv.exp
>>>> index bc99cc0c3cf4..19179564361a 100644
>>>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/rvv.exp
>>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/rvv.exp
>>>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ if [istarget riscv32-*-*] then {
>>>>
>>>> # Initialize `dg'.
>>>> dg-init
>>>> +torture-init
>>>>
>>>> # Main loop.
>>>> set CFLAGS "$DEFAULT_CFLAGS -march=$gcc_march -mabi=$gcc_mabi -O3"
>>>> @@ -69,5 +70,7 @@ foreach op $AUTOVEC_TEST_OPTS {
>>>> dg-runtest [lsort [glob -nocomplain
>>>> $srcdir/$subdir/autovec/vls-vlmax/*.\[cS\]]] \
>>>> "-std=c99 -O3 -ftree-vectorize --param
>>>> riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax" $CFLAGS
>>>>
>>>> +torture-finish
>>>> +
>>>> # All done.
>>>> dg-finish
>>>> --
>>>> 2.40.1
>>>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-24 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-22 6:41 Kito Cheng
2023-05-22 9:17 ` Kito Cheng
2023-05-23 3:52 ` Vineet Gupta
2023-05-24 18:18 ` Vineet Gupta
2023-05-24 20:34 ` Thomas Schwinge [this message]
2023-05-24 22:13 ` Vineet Gupta
2023-05-24 23:12 ` Vineet Gupta
2023-05-24 23:13 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-05-25 3:43 ` RISC-V Bootstrap problems Jeff Law
2023-05-25 3:46 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-05-25 3:53 ` Kito Cheng
2023-05-25 3:54 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-05-25 4:07 ` Jeff Law
2023-05-25 4:19 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-05-25 13:55 ` Jeff Law
2023-05-25 4:06 ` Jeff Law
2023-05-25 4:08 ` Kito Cheng
2023-05-25 3:51 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-05-24 23:15 ` [PATCH] RISC-V: Add missing torture-init and torture-finish for rvv.exp Jeff Law
2023-05-25 20:26 ` Thomas Schwinge
2023-05-26 23:38 ` Vineet Gupta
2023-05-30 18:43 ` Vineet Gupta
2023-05-31 16:28 ` Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jzwxsc3b.fsf@dem-tschwing-1.ger.mentorg.com \
--to=thomas.schwinge@siemens.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jlaw@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
--cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
--cc=macro@embecosm.com \
--cc=patrick@rivosinc.com \
--cc=vineetg@rivosinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).