public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Special Memory Constraint [was Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra]
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16f173b7-d835-48f9-aaed-d5d38d4748ca@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190819073553.pi644qzyokxmynr2@jocasta.intra>


On 2019-08-19 3:35 a.m., John Darrington wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:50:13AM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>       
>       
>       No I meant something like that
>       
>       (define_special_memory_constraint "a" ...)
>       (define_predicate "my_special_predicate" ...
>       		
>        {
>          if (lra_in_progress_p)
>            return REG_P (op) && REGNO (op) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER && reg_renumber[REGNO(op)] < 0;
>          return true if memory with sp addressing;
>       })
>       
>       I think LRA spills pseudo-register and it will be memory addressed by sp
>       at the end of LRA.
>
> What I've done is this:
>
> (define_predicate "my_special_predicate"
> 		    (match_operand 0 "memory_operand")
>   {
>     debug_rtx (op);
>     gcc_assert (MEM_P (op));
>     op = XEXP (op, 0);
>     if (GET_CODE (op) == PLUS)
>       op = XEXP (op, 0);
>
>     if (lra_in_progress)
>       {
>         fprintf (stderr, "%s:%d\n", __FILE__, __LINE__);
>         return REG_P (op) && REGNO (op) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER && reg_renumber[REGNO(op)] < 0;
>       }
>
>
>     if (REG_P (op))
>       {
>         int regno = REGNO (op);
>         return (regno == 10); // register is the stack pointer
>       }
>
>     return true;
>   })
>
>   (and many variations)  Unfortunately, any moderately complicated input
>   still results in a (mem (reg) ) insn repeatedly entering the
>   lra_in_progress case and returning false, and eventually terminating with
>       
>   "internal compiler error: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)"
>
>
> Any other ideas?
   As I remember there were a few other ideas from Richard Biener and 
Segher Boessenkool.  I also proposed to add a new address register which 
will be always a fixed stack memory slot at the end. Unfortunately I am 
not familiar with the target and the port to say in details how to do 
it.  But I think it is worth to try.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-19 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-04 19:18 Indirect memory addresses vs. lra John Darrington
2019-08-08 16:25 ` Vladimir Makarov
2019-08-08 16:44   ` Paul Koning
2019-08-08 17:21     ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-08 17:25       ` Paul Koning
2019-08-08 19:09         ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-08 17:30       ` Paul Koning
2019-08-08 19:19         ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-08 19:57           ` Jeff Law
2019-08-09  8:14             ` John Darrington
2019-08-09 14:17               ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-09 14:23                 ` Paul Koning
2019-08-10  6:10                 ` John Darrington
2019-08-10 16:15                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-09 16:07               ` Jeff Law
2019-08-09 17:34               ` Vladimir Makarov
2019-08-10  6:06                 ` John Darrington
2019-08-10 16:12                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-12  6:47                     ` John Darrington
2019-08-12  8:40                       ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-12 13:35                   ` Vladimir Makarov
2019-08-15 16:29                   ` Vladimir Makarov
2019-08-15 16:38                     ` Richard Biener
2019-08-15 17:41                       ` John Darrington
2019-08-15 18:30                       ` Vladimir Makarov
2019-08-15 21:22                         ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-15 17:36                     ` John Darrington
2019-08-15 18:23                       ` Vladimir Makarov
2019-08-16 11:24                         ` Special Memory Constraint [was Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra] John Darrington
2019-08-16 14:50                           ` Vladimir Makarov
2019-08-19  7:36                             ` John Darrington
2019-08-19 13:14                               ` Vladimir Makarov [this message]
2019-08-19 15:07                                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-19 18:06                                   ` John Darrington
2019-08-20  6:56                                     ` Richard Biener
2019-08-20  7:07                                       ` John Darrington
2019-08-20  7:30                                         ` Richard Biener
2019-08-08 18:46     ` Indirect memory addresses vs. lra Vladimir Makarov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16f173b7-d835-48f9-aaed-d5d38d4748ca@redhat.com \
    --to=vmakarov@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).