public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>,
	       John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>,
	       Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>,
	       Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	       Paul Koning <paulkoning@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 17:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190815174148.4pdum5srubvs7bqb@jocasta.intra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D1EAC183-4384-4404-90FF-CC30FD365131@gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 06:38:30PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:

   Couldn't we spill the frame pointer? Basically we should be able to
   compute the first address into a reg, spill that, do the second
   (both could require the frame pointer), spill the frame pointer,
   reload the first computed address from the stack, execute the insn
   and then reload the frame pointer. 
     
     Maybe the frame pointer can also be implemented 'virually' in an index register that you keep updated so that sp + reg
     Is the FP. Or frame accesses can use a  Stack slot as FP and the indirect memory 
     Addressing... (is there an indirect lea?)

Yes.  lea x, [4,x] is a valid instruction.

J'

-- 
Avoid eavesdropping.  Send strong encrypted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-15 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-04 19:18 John Darrington
2019-08-08 16:25 ` Vladimir Makarov
2019-08-08 16:44   ` Paul Koning
2019-08-08 17:21     ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-08 17:25       ` Paul Koning
2019-08-08 19:09         ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-08 17:30       ` Paul Koning
2019-08-08 19:19         ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-08 19:57           ` Jeff Law
2019-08-09  8:14             ` John Darrington
2019-08-09 14:17               ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-09 14:23                 ` Paul Koning
2019-08-10  6:10                 ` John Darrington
2019-08-10 16:15                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-09 16:07               ` Jeff Law
2019-08-09 17:34               ` Vladimir Makarov
2019-08-10  6:06                 ` John Darrington
2019-08-10 16:12                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-12  6:47                     ` John Darrington
2019-08-12  8:40                       ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-12 13:35                   ` Vladimir Makarov
2019-08-15 16:29                   ` Vladimir Makarov
2019-08-15 16:38                     ` Richard Biener
2019-08-15 17:41                       ` John Darrington [this message]
2019-08-15 18:30                       ` Vladimir Makarov
2019-08-15 21:22                         ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-15 17:36                     ` John Darrington
2019-08-15 18:23                       ` Vladimir Makarov
2019-08-16 11:24                         ` Special Memory Constraint [was Re: Indirect memory addresses vs. lra] John Darrington
2019-08-16 14:50                           ` Vladimir Makarov
2019-08-19  7:36                             ` John Darrington
2019-08-19 13:14                               ` Vladimir Makarov
2019-08-19 15:07                                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-19 18:06                                   ` John Darrington
2019-08-20  6:56                                     ` Richard Biener
2019-08-20  7:07                                       ` John Darrington
2019-08-20  7:30                                         ` Richard Biener
2019-08-08 18:46     ` Indirect memory addresses vs. lra Vladimir Makarov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190815174148.4pdum5srubvs7bqb@jocasta.intra \
    --to=john@darrington.wattle.id.au \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulkoning@comcast.net \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=vmakarov@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).