public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
To: binutils@sourceware.org
Cc: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 31/43] aarch64: Make AARCH64_OPDE_REG_LIST take a bitfield
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:23:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230330102359.3327695-32-richard.sandiford@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230330102359.3327695-1-richard.sandiford@arm.com>

AARCH64_OPDE_REG_LIST took a single operand that specified the
expected number of registers.  However, there are quite a few
SME2 instructions that have both 2-register forms and (separate)
4-register forms.  If the user tries to use a 3-register list,
it isn't obvious which opcode entry they meant.  Saying that we
expect 2 registers and saying that we expect 4 registers would
both be wrong.

This patch therefore switches the operand to a bitfield.  If a
AARCH64_OPDE_REG_LIST is reported against multiple opcode entries,
the patch ORs up the expected lengths.

This has no user-visible effect yet.  A later patch adds more error
strings, alongside tests that use them.
---
 gas/config/tc-aarch64.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 opcodes/aarch64-opc.c   |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gas/config/tc-aarch64.c b/gas/config/tc-aarch64.c
index 145e241b13b..a57cc2bc080 100644
--- a/gas/config/tc-aarch64.c
+++ b/gas/config/tc-aarch64.c
@@ -4914,6 +4914,20 @@ parse_sys_ins_reg (char **str, htab_t sys_ins_regs)
       goto failure;						\
   } while (0)
 \f
+/* A primitive log calculator.  */
+
+static inline unsigned int
+get_log2 (unsigned int n)
+{
+  unsigned int count = 0;
+  while (n > 1)
+    {
+      n >>= 1;
+      count += 1;
+    }
+  return count;
+}
+
 /* encode the 12-bit imm field of Add/sub immediate */
 static inline uint32_t
 encode_addsub_imm (uint32_t imm)
@@ -5732,14 +5746,17 @@ output_operand_error_record (const operand_error_record *record, char *str)
       break;
 
     case AARCH64_OPDE_REG_LIST:
-      if (detail->data[0].i == 1)
+      if (detail->data[0].i == (1 << 1))
 	handler (_("invalid number of registers in the list; "
 		   "only 1 register is expected at operand %d -- `%s'"),
 		 idx + 1, str);
-      else
+      else if ((detail->data[0].i & -detail->data[0].i) == detail->data[0].i)
 	handler (_("invalid number of registers in the list; "
 		   "%d registers are expected at operand %d -- `%s'"),
-	       detail->data[0].i, idx + 1, str);
+		 get_log2 (detail->data[0].i), idx + 1, str);
+      else
+	handler (_("invalid number of registers in the list"
+		   " at operand %d -- `%s'"), idx + 1, str);
       break;
 
     case AARCH64_OPDE_UNALIGNED:
@@ -5807,6 +5824,12 @@ output_operand_error_report (char *str, bool non_fatal_only)
 		       curr->detail.data[0].i, curr->detail.data[1].i,
 		       curr->detail.data[2].i);
 	}
+      else if (curr->detail.kind == AARCH64_OPDE_REG_LIST)
+	{
+	  DEBUG_TRACE ("\t%s [%x]",
+		       operand_mismatch_kind_names[curr->detail.kind],
+		       curr->detail.data[0].i);
+	}
       else
 	{
 	  DEBUG_TRACE ("\t%s", operand_mismatch_kind_names[curr->detail.kind]);
@@ -5847,6 +5870,13 @@ output_operand_error_report (char *str, bool non_fatal_only)
 			   curr->detail.data[0].i, curr->detail.data[1].i,
 			   curr->detail.data[2].i);
 	    }
+	  else if (kind == AARCH64_OPDE_REG_LIST)
+	    {
+	      record->detail.data[0].i |= curr->detail.data[0].i;
+	      DEBUG_TRACE ("\t--> %s [%x]",
+			   operand_mismatch_kind_names[kind],
+			   curr->detail.data[0].i);
+	    }
 	}
     }
 
@@ -6191,22 +6221,6 @@ process_movw_reloc_info (void)
   return true;
 }
 
-/* A primitive log calculator.  */
-
-static inline unsigned int
-get_logsz (unsigned int size)
-{
-  const unsigned char ls[16] =
-    {0, 1, -1, 2, -1, -1, -1, 3, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, 4};
-  if (size > 16)
-    {
-      gas_assert (0);
-      return -1;
-    }
-  gas_assert (ls[size - 1] != (unsigned char)-1);
-  return ls[size - 1];
-}
-
 /* Determine and return the real reloc type code for an instruction
    with the pseudo reloc type code BFD_RELOC_AARCH64_LDST_LO12.  */
 
@@ -6271,7 +6285,7 @@ ldst_lo12_determine_real_reloc_type (void)
 				      1, opd0_qlf, 0);
   gas_assert (opd1_qlf != AARCH64_OPND_QLF_NIL);
 
-  logsz = get_logsz (aarch64_get_qualifier_esize (opd1_qlf));
+  logsz = get_log2 (aarch64_get_qualifier_esize (opd1_qlf));
 
   if (inst.reloc.type == BFD_RELOC_AARCH64_TLSLD_LDST_DTPREL_LO12
       || inst.reloc.type == BFD_RELOC_AARCH64_TLSLD_LDST_DTPREL_LO12_NC
diff --git a/opcodes/aarch64-opc.c b/opcodes/aarch64-opc.c
index dfffbf6f6e5..590d227fde3 100644
--- a/opcodes/aarch64-opc.c
+++ b/opcodes/aarch64-opc.c
@@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@ set_reg_list_error (aarch64_operand_error *mismatch_detail, int idx,
   if (mismatch_detail == NULL)
     return;
   set_error (mismatch_detail, AARCH64_OPDE_REG_LIST, idx, NULL);
-  mismatch_detail->data[0].i = expected_num;
+  mismatch_detail->data[0].i = 1 << expected_num;
 }
 
 static inline void
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-30 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-30 10:23 [PATCH 00/43] aarch64: Groundwork for SME2 support Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 01/43] aarch64: Fix PSEL opcode mask Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 02/43] aarch64: Restrict range of PRFM opcodes Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 03/43] aarch64: Fix SVE2 register/immediate distinction Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 04/43] aarch64: Make SME instructions use F_STRICT Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 05/43] aarch64: Use aarch64_operand_error more widely Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 06/43] aarch64: Rename REG_TYPE_ZA* to REG_TYPE_ZAT* Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 07/43] aarch64: Add REG_TYPE_ZATHV Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 08/43] aarch64: Move vectype_to_qualifier further up Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 09/43] aarch64: Rework parse_typed_reg interface Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 10/43] aarch64: Reuse parse_typed_reg for ZA tiles Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 11/43] aarch64: Consolidate ZA tile range checks Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 12/43] aarch64: Treat ZA as a register Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 13/43] aarch64: Rename za_tile_vector to za_index Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 14/43] aarch64: Make indexed_za use 64-bit immediates Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 15/43] aarch64: Pass aarch64_indexed_za to parsers Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 16/43] aarch64: Move ZA range checks to aarch64-opc.c Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 17/43] aarch64: Consolidate ZA slice parsing Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 18/43] aarch64: Commonise index parsing Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 19/43] aarch64: Move w12-w15 range check to libopcodes Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 20/43] aarch64: Tweak error for missing immediate offset Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 21/43] aarch64: Tweak errors for base & offset registers Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 22/43] aarch64: Tweak parsing of integer & FP registers Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 23/43] aarch64: Improve errors for malformed register lists Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 24/43] aarch64: Try to avoid inappropriate default errors Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 25/43] aarch64: Rework reporting of failed register checks Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 26/43] aarch64: Update operand_mismatch_kind_names Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 27/43] aarch64: Deprioritise AARCH64_OPDE_REG_LIST Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 28/43] aarch64: Add an error code for out-of-range registers Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 29/43] aarch64: Commonise checks for index operands Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 30/43] aarch64: Add an operand class for SVE register lists Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 32/43] aarch64: Tweak register list errors Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 33/43] aarch64: Try to report invalid variants against the closest match Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 34/43] aarch64: Tweak priorities of parsing-related errors Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 35/43] aarch64: Rename aarch64-tbl.h OP_SME_* macros Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 36/43] aarch64: Reorder some OP_SVE_* macros Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 37/43] aarch64: Add a aarch64_cpu_supports_inst_p helper Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 38/43] aarch64: Rename some of GAS's REG_TYPE_* macros Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 39/43] aarch64: Regularise FLD_* suffixes Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 40/43] aarch64: Resync field names Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 41/43] aarch64: Sort fields alphanumerically Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 42/43] aarch64: Add support for strided register lists Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 15:50   ` Simon Marchi
2023-03-30 16:06     ` Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 43/43] aarch64: Prefer register ranges & support wrapping Richard Sandiford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230330102359.3327695-32-richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    --to=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).