public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
To: binutils@sourceware.org
Cc: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/43] aarch64: Fix SVE2 register/immediate distinction
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:23:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230330102359.3327695-4-richard.sandiford@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230330102359.3327695-1-richard.sandiford@arm.com>

GAS refuses to interpret register names like x0 as unadorned
immediates, due to the obvious potential for confusion with
register operands.  (An explicit #x0 is OK.)

For compatibility reasons, we can't extend the set of registers
that GAS rejects for existing instructions.  For example:

   mov x0, z0

was valid code before SVE was added, so it needs to stay valid
code even when SVE is enabled.  But we can make GAS reject newer
registers in newer instructions.  The SVE instruction:

   and z0.s, z0.s, z0.h

is therefore invalid, rather than z0.h being an immediate.

This patch extends the SVE behaviour to SVE2.  The old call
to AARCH64_CPU_HAS_FEATURE was technically the wrong way around,
although it didn't matter in practice for base SVE instructions
since their avariants only set SVE.
---
 gas/config/tc-aarch64.c                  | 4 +++-
 gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/illegal-sve2.l | 7 +++++++
 gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/illegal-sve2.s | 3 +++
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gas/config/tc-aarch64.c b/gas/config/tc-aarch64.c
index eb28ea3dce2..67b0e61a7ff 100644
--- a/gas/config/tc-aarch64.c
+++ b/gas/config/tc-aarch64.c
@@ -6350,7 +6350,9 @@ parse_operands (char *str, const aarch64_opcode *opcode)
   clear_error ();
   skip_whitespace (str);
 
-  if (AARCH64_CPU_HAS_FEATURE (AARCH64_FEATURE_SVE, *opcode->avariant))
+  if (AARCH64_CPU_HAS_ANY_FEATURES (*opcode->avariant,
+				    AARCH64_FEATURE_SVE
+				    | AARCH64_FEATURE_SVE2))
     imm_reg_type = REG_TYPE_R_Z_SP_BHSDQ_VZP;
   else
     imm_reg_type = REG_TYPE_R_Z_BHSDQ_V;
diff --git a/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/illegal-sve2.l b/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/illegal-sve2.l
index 7656c2f91b1..c3ef21aa6d9 100644
--- a/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/illegal-sve2.l
+++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/illegal-sve2.l
@@ -3328,3 +3328,10 @@
 [^ :]+:[0-9]+: Error: immediate value out of range 1 to 32 at operand 4 -- `xar z0\.s,z0\.s,z0\.s,#0'
 [^ :]+:[0-9]+: Error: immediate value out of range 1 to 32 at operand 4 -- `xar z0\.s,z0\.s,z0\.s,#33'
 [^ :]+:[0-9]+: Error: immediate value out of range 1 to 64 at operand 4 -- `xar z0\.d,z0\.d,z0\.d,#0'
+[^ :]+:[0-9]+: Error: operand mismatch -- `sqshl z1\.s,p0/m,z1\.s,z0\.h'
+[^ :]+:[0-9]+: Info:    did you mean this\?
+[^ :]+:[0-9]+: Info:    	sqshl z1\.s, p0/m, z1\.s, z0\.s
+[^ :]+:[0-9]+: Info:    other valid variant\(s\):
+[^ :]+:[0-9]+: Info:    	sqshl z1\.b, p0/m, z1\.b, z0\.b
+[^ :]+:[0-9]+: Info:    	sqshl z1\.h, p0/m, z1\.h, z0\.h
+[^ :]+:[0-9]+: Info:    	sqshl z1\.d, p0/m, z1\.d, z0\.d
diff --git a/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/illegal-sve2.s b/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/illegal-sve2.s
index 8ad7fbf1d1b..3f3602a8474 100644
--- a/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/illegal-sve2.s
+++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/illegal-sve2.s
@@ -2072,3 +2072,6 @@ xar z0.s, z0.s, z0.s, #0
 xar z0.s, z0.s, z0.s, #33
 xar z0.d, z0.d, z0.d, #0
 xar z0.d, z0.d, z0.d, #64
+
+.equ z0.h, 1
+sqshl z1.s, p0/m, z1.s, z0.h
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-30 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-30 10:23 [PATCH 00/43] aarch64: Groundwork for SME2 support Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 01/43] aarch64: Fix PSEL opcode mask Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 02/43] aarch64: Restrict range of PRFM opcodes Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 04/43] aarch64: Make SME instructions use F_STRICT Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 05/43] aarch64: Use aarch64_operand_error more widely Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 06/43] aarch64: Rename REG_TYPE_ZA* to REG_TYPE_ZAT* Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 07/43] aarch64: Add REG_TYPE_ZATHV Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 08/43] aarch64: Move vectype_to_qualifier further up Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 09/43] aarch64: Rework parse_typed_reg interface Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 10/43] aarch64: Reuse parse_typed_reg for ZA tiles Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 11/43] aarch64: Consolidate ZA tile range checks Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 12/43] aarch64: Treat ZA as a register Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 13/43] aarch64: Rename za_tile_vector to za_index Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 14/43] aarch64: Make indexed_za use 64-bit immediates Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 15/43] aarch64: Pass aarch64_indexed_za to parsers Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 16/43] aarch64: Move ZA range checks to aarch64-opc.c Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 17/43] aarch64: Consolidate ZA slice parsing Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 18/43] aarch64: Commonise index parsing Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 19/43] aarch64: Move w12-w15 range check to libopcodes Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 20/43] aarch64: Tweak error for missing immediate offset Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 21/43] aarch64: Tweak errors for base & offset registers Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 22/43] aarch64: Tweak parsing of integer & FP registers Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 23/43] aarch64: Improve errors for malformed register lists Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 24/43] aarch64: Try to avoid inappropriate default errors Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 25/43] aarch64: Rework reporting of failed register checks Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 26/43] aarch64: Update operand_mismatch_kind_names Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 27/43] aarch64: Deprioritise AARCH64_OPDE_REG_LIST Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 28/43] aarch64: Add an error code for out-of-range registers Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 29/43] aarch64: Commonise checks for index operands Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 30/43] aarch64: Add an operand class for SVE register lists Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 31/43] aarch64: Make AARCH64_OPDE_REG_LIST take a bitfield Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 32/43] aarch64: Tweak register list errors Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 33/43] aarch64: Try to report invalid variants against the closest match Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 34/43] aarch64: Tweak priorities of parsing-related errors Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 35/43] aarch64: Rename aarch64-tbl.h OP_SME_* macros Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 36/43] aarch64: Reorder some OP_SVE_* macros Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 37/43] aarch64: Add a aarch64_cpu_supports_inst_p helper Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 38/43] aarch64: Rename some of GAS's REG_TYPE_* macros Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 39/43] aarch64: Regularise FLD_* suffixes Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 40/43] aarch64: Resync field names Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 41/43] aarch64: Sort fields alphanumerically Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 42/43] aarch64: Add support for strided register lists Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 15:50   ` Simon Marchi
2023-03-30 16:06     ` Richard Sandiford
2023-03-30 10:23 ` [PATCH 43/43] aarch64: Prefer register ranges & support wrapping Richard Sandiford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230330102359.3327695-4-richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    --to=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).